Medication Compliance and Social Security Disability

It is not mandatory that you be on some kind of medication to apply for Social Security disability. Nor are the Social Security Disability Rules definitions based on the medications that you are prescribed. But with that being said, if your condition could be better controlled with a certain type of medication and you’re not taking it, then the examiner might see that as a sign that your condition might not be disabling.

Furthermore, the disability examiner might feel that either you are not seeking care for your disability and that is why you are not on medication; or that your doctor feels that your condition(s) are not severe enough to need medication. So once you are given a medication for your condition, you should take it as prescribed. By showing Social Security Disability that you are working with your doctor to try to control you condition(s) and that you are being compliant with what is being asked of you pertaining to your doctor’s medical directions.

You and your doctor need to work together to prove to Social Security that even though you are taking the medication(s) as you are supposed to, the debilitating condition(s) that keep you from working are still affecting your daily life. The best way is to stay compliant with your medication(s). If you go off and on the medication(s) it could be construed that this might be why you are unable to work.

Unfortunately you might be one of the people that are either uninsured or cannot afford the treatment(s) they need. If you fall into either of these groups, you will have a harder time proving that you are disabled. If this is your situation, check into free clinics, county assistance, and any other professional opportunities available to you to get the care you need. Final thought! Once compliant with your medication(s) and treatment(s) do everything in you can to stay that way. It is in your best interest medically and it will assist you in having the credibility needed for your Social Security Disability Claim.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


An Explanation of Continuing Disability Review

The Social Security Administration periodically checks up on Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) beneficiaries to assure that the individuals continue to be disabled. This process is called continuing disability review (CDR).

These reviews will happen at various times. The frequency of these reviews depends upon the medical condition and age of the recipient. A review can happen at 6-18 months for conditions that are expected to improve. If there is a possibility for improvement, then a review will be triggered at three years. For those conditions where improvement is not expected, a review happens anywhere from 5-7 years. It is noteworthy that reviews are more frequent for those beneficiaries under the age of 50. This is because the standard to be found disabled is higher for those under 50.

CDR can be triggered by certain events. These include returning to work, reporting an improvement, medical evidence showing improvement, a third party reporting failure to follow treatment, or a new treatment becoming available for your medical condition.

These reviews entail SSA obtaining the medical records from the year prior to the CDR notice. Thus, it is important to continue going to the doctor even after being found disabled. If these records are insufficient, SSA can send the individual to a consultative exam. Your disability benefits will continue as long as the condition remains the same. Improvements are evaluated to determine whether the individual is capable of working. The benefits will cease if it is determine that you can work.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Childhood Disability

Under the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, the Social Security Administration (SSA) can provide payments to children who are disabled. This child will usually also be eligible for Medicaid, food stamps, and other services.

There are two areas that must be met to receive SSI. The first is the financial criteria based on income and resources of the child and their family. The Second is the medical requirement finding them disabled under the rules of the SSA.

When a child is eligible for SSI, SSA will usually make the cash payments to a responsible person or organization. This is known as a representative payee. Usually, the child’s parent or another relative will be appointed as the representative payee. The payee’s responsibility is to provide food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and personal care items for the disabled child.

Under SSA law, a child is considered to be disabled if they have a medically determinable impairment that results in marked and severe functional limitations and has lasted or is expected to last 12 months in duration. The medical impairments must be shown with medical evidence consisting of symptoms, signs, and lab findings.

 

 

For more information, please contact one of the attorneys at Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


You have Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease and need Social Security Disability

Undifferentiated connective tissue disease can be difficult to diagnosis. It is a systemic autoimmune disease. What this means is that a person with this disease, their immune system does not behave as it should. Instead of fighting infections like viruses, a person with undifferentiated connective tissue disease’s immune system attacks its own body.

Someone with undifferentiated connective tissue disease would see a rheumatologist. As the phrase “connective tissue disease” implies, these are diseases that might involve the muscles, joints, skin, heart, lungs, and eyes just to name a few.  A person who has features of connective tissue disease but, does not fulfill the diagnostic benchmarks for any one disease; would be considered to have undifferentiated connective tissue disease. This disease may progress into one specific connective tissue disease over time.

Some of the symptoms of this disease are fatigue, swelling of the lymph nodes, muscle weakness, shortness of breath, heartburn, cough, chest pain, and joint pain. This is not a complete list of the possible symptoms that are attributed to this disease. To diagnosis this disease, as mentioned above a rheumatologist is required. This type of doctor is a specialist in this area.

It takes many factors to diagnosis undifferentiated connective tissue disease. A complete history and examination are vital. Also things like labs, x-rays, CT scans. There is no one blood test to confirm this disease. There is also no cure for this disease. The best course of action is early identification and treatment. Since, before a treatment can be recommended, the extent of the damage to the organ(s) is needed. Persons with this type of disease are usually put on anti-inflammatories and an immunosuppressant.

To prove a case of disability to the Social Security Administration you will have to have medical evidence that shows which organs are being affected and how they are being affected. Along with to what degree. The list of symptoms that you are experiencing and how your life might be being affected by your disease. Like how the disease affects your daily activities. Or does it affect your concentration and how it does this.

This article gives a basic outline of Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease. Who you should see if you feel you might suffer from it and what types of tests one might have to take to be diagnosed. Along with what Social Security Disability will want to see in your evidence to possibly deem you disabled and approve your claim.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Health and Physical Well Being

In order for a child to be found disabled, they must either meet or functionally equal a “listing” (a list of impairments that the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) has said will result in a finding of disability if the impairment is severe enough). Thus, if a child has an impairment that is on the list, and it is as severe as required by SSA, that child “meets” the listing. However, if the impairment does not meet the specific criteria in the listing, the child can still be found disabled if the impairment “functionally equals” a listing. This is done by showing that the child is either “marked” in 2 of the 6 domains, or “extreme” in 1 of the 6. SSA has defined being marked or extreme in a domain as having impairment or impairments that interferes seriously with your ability to independently initiate, sustain, or complete activities. Obviously to prove an extreme limitation, you would have to prove it interferes more substantially than a marked limitation, although the definition is more involved than this.

The 6 domains are: “acquiring and using information; attending and completing tasks; interacting and relating with others; moving about and manipulating objects; caring for yourself; and health and physical well-being. This article deals with the third domain: “health and physical well-being.”

So, how does one prove that a child is marked or extreme in this domain? Social Security Ruling (“SSR”) 09-8p gives us some guidance. This domain considers “. . . the cumulative physical effects of physical and mental impairments and their associated treatments on a child’s health and functioning. Unlike the other five domains of functional equivalence (which address a child’s abilities), this domain does not address typical development and functioning. Rather, the “Health and physical well-being” domain addresses how such things as recurrent illness, the side effects of medication, and the need for ongoing treatment affect a child’s body; that is, the child’s health and sense of physical well-being.”

The first point to note from this, is that the SSA will take into account effects from both the impairment itself or from treatment. Thus, if a child feels dizzy because it is a symptom of his or her impairment, or because it is a side effect of medication, it will be considered.

This ruling also explicitly notes that symptoms can fluctuate, and they will consider “…the frequency and duration of exacerbations, as well as the extent to which they affect a child’s ability to function physically.”

Some examples of limitations given in this ruling are whether the child:

  • Has generalized symptoms caused by an impairment(s) (for example, tiredness due to depression).
  • Has somatic complaints related to an impairment(s) (for example, epilepsy).
  • Has chronic medication side effects (for example, dizziness).
  • Needs frequent treatment or therapy (for example, multiple surgeries or chemotherapy).
  • Experiences periodic exacerbations (for example, pain crises in sickle cell anemia).
  • Needs intensive medical care as a result of being medically fragile

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Domain #2 – Attending and Completing Tasks

If a child has a severe impairment(s) that does not meet or medically equal any listing, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will then look to see if the child functionally equals the listings.  To functionally equal the listing, the child’s impairments must result in marked limitations in two domains, or extreme limitation in one domain.

The second domain used by SSA is called 2. Attending and completing tasks.  In this domain, SSA considers how well the child is able to focus and maintain attention, and how well the child starts, follows through, and finishes their activities.  With this, pace at which the activities are performed is also considered.

Attention involves how the child regulates their level of alertness and maintains concentration.  SSA will look at a child’s ability to filter out distractions and stay focused on activity or a task.  This would include focusing long enough to initiate and complete an activity or task, and change focus once the task is completed.

Adequate attention is also needed to maintain physical and mental effort and concentration on an activity or task.  Adequate attention allows the child to think and reflect before starting or stopping an activity.  SSA will consider all of the relevant information in the case record when deciding whether the child’s medically determinable impairment(s) result in marked or extreme limitations in this domain.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Domain #1 – Acquiring and Using Information

If a child has a severe impairment(s) that does not meet or medically equal any listing, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will then look to see if the child functionally equals the listings.  To functionally equal the listing, the child’s impairments must result in marked limitations in two domains, or extreme limitation in one domain.

The first domain used by SSA is called 1. Acquiring and using information.  In this domain SSA considers how well the child acquires or learn information, and how well you use the information the child has learned.  Children learn through life experiences growing up.  Using the concepts they have acquired through play and experiences, they should be able to learn to read, write, do math, and understand and use new information.

Thinking is the application or use of information that the child has learned.  This includes perceiving relationships, reasons, and making logical choices.  The child must also be able to use language to think about the world and understand others.  SSA will consider all of the relevant information in the case record when deciding whether the child’s medically determinable impairment(s) result in marked or extreme limitations in this domain.

 

For more information, please contact one of the attorneys at Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Compassionate Allowance Diseases: Alpers Disease

The Social Security Administration established the Compassionate Allowances program in an attempt to expedite cases where individuals have medical conditions that are very severe and would qualify under one of the listings. However, not all diseases are met under a specific listing, but still may be approved under the CAL.

Alpers disease is a progressive neurologic disorder that begins during childhood and is complicated in many instances by serious liver disease. Symptoms include increased muscle tone with exaggerated reflexes (spasticity), seizures, and loss of cognitive ability (dementia). Diagnosis is established by testing for the POLG gene. Symptoms typically occur months before tissue samples show the mitochondrial DNA depletion, so that these depletion studies cannot be used for early diagnosis;  about 80 percent of individuals with Alpers’ disease develop symptoms in the first two years of life, and 20 percent develop symptoms between ages 2 and 25. The first symptoms of the disorder are usually nonspecific and may include hypoglycemia secondary to underlying liver disease, failure to thrive, infection-associated encephalopathy, spasticity, myoclonus (involuntary jerking of a muscle or group of muscles), seizures, or liver failure.

Individuals who have been diagnosed with Alpers typically die before they reach the age of 10, usually caused by unrelenting seizures. The course of the disease is usually rapid and eventually the combination of the diseased brain and increasing physical weakness becomes too great to sustain life, and death usually occurs within a year. Parents will be aware of the child’s increasing frailty, and death is usually relatively peaceful and expected when the time comes.

Alpers may be diagnosed under SSA Listings 111.02, 111.06, and 112.02. SSA suggests that there be clinical history and examination that describes the progression of neurological and cognitive decline from the treating primary care physician, neurologist, or psychiatrist, EEG reports, and lab tests consistent pf hepatic failure, to adequately assess.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Award Letter Issue: Current Workers Comp

Often clients who have disability claims will also have workers comp claims. When there are workers comp benefits involved, there sometimes will arise difficulties with the award letters when social security is calculating payments. Sometimes, the award letters will state that claimants are currently receiving workers comp benefits, when in reality, they have not received benefits in possibly years. Social security factor in these benefits immediately. This upsets clients, because their present benefit amounts are reduced.

In these situations, it is the payment center that intentionally processes the claims like this. If a claimant is still currently receiving workers comp, this prevents them from potentially getting overpaid. While it does not seem like it, and must be explained to the clients, this benefits the clients by preventing an overpayment. The discrepancy is fixed by providing proof that they are no longer receiving benefits through the Stipulation for Settlement and the Award on Stipulation. We then ask to re-calculate the benefits so that the claimant will get the correct amount. While this appears on the surface to be a mistake, many clients will question this and chalk it up to a mistake on SSA.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Will a Congressional Inquiry Help me Get Approved?

Applying for social security benefits can be a long and overwhelming process. By far, the waiting is the most frustrating for the majority of claimants. Some claimant’s will look to their congressman or state senator to intervene. A congressional inquiry is a “status check” of your disability claim. When the inquiry is received, social security will respond by providing the status of your case. This request can also prompt social security to get cases moving along a much faster pace. Unfortunately, many claimants confuse the purpose of a congressional inquiry.

The inquiry starts by sending a letter to your local senator or representative’s office requesting that they find out more information about your claim. Be sure to include the length of time you’ve been waiting, medical conditions, and the need for the inquiry. Sometimes a case may be in the process of being approved at the time of the inquiry. Understandably, it is assumed that the case was approved due to the inquiry. Disability examiners and judges cannot be influenced to approve a case because of an inquiry.

A congressional inquiry that is submitted at the lower level of the claim has very little influence, if any at all. Disability examiners rely heavily on medical records that describes a claimants functional limitations. The time frame in which disability examiners can come to a decision is based on how fast the medical facilities comply with the request for records.

At the hearing level, if a claimant is experiencing financial hardship, a congressional inquiry can help a case get scheduled a lot faster. Providing evidence of financial hardship is critical when trying to get a sooner hearing date.

For more information, please contact Hoglund, Chwialkowski, Mrozik, PLLC.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


SSI Benefits for Children with Abdominal Migraines

Abdominal migraines are characterized by severe, sharp abdominal pain near the midline, lasting from one hour to three days, and are more common in children. Although experts have not settled on a specific cause, this condition is in the migraine family because it may have an underlying neurological or chemical origin, and may be triggered by psychological, environmental or dietary factors. A diagnosis is usually reached by ruling out other causes of abdominal pain, and treatment options include those used for migraine headaches.

Due to the difficulties in diagnosing and treating this condition, a child with abdominal migraines may experience difficulties in school and other activities for a long time without relief. If your child has had repeated episodes of abdominal pain diagnosed as abdominal migraine, consider contacting a Social Security Disability lawyer to discuss whether you and your child are eligible for Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Disability Benefits for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

If your symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome are preventing you from working, you may be entitled to disability benefits. In early 2014, a new ruling was created that helps the Social Security Administration evaluate the severity of chronic fatigue and how it contributes to your disability. SSR 14-1p helps to clarify what evidence is needed to prove that you have this impairment, and to prove how severe it is.

Social Security must consider the following symptoms: postexertional malaise lasting more than 24 hours after activity; impaired short-term memory and concentration; sore throat; tender lymph nodes; multi-joint pain without swelling; headaches; and waking unrefreshed. Other symptoms of this condition could include muscle weakness, disturbed sleep, visual problems, dizziness and lightheadedness, heart palpitations and arrhythmias, and gastrointestinal complaints. These symptoms should be documented by your primary physician, and other conditions that cause these symptoms must be ruled out. The medical evidence from your doctor must show that the physical symptoms such as a sore throat or tender lymph nodes must have lasted for about six months consecutively.

Combined, these symptoms must have such a strong effect on you that it prevents you from working on a full-time basis for at least 12 months or more. Social Security will get information about your daily disability, meaning how your daily activities have changed, and how your disability has negatively impacted your life.

If you have other impairments, such as fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, or other conditions that co-occur with the chronic fatigue syndrome, these will be evaluated independently, but may also be considered as proof of the chronic fatigue syndrome.

If you are unable to work because of your chronic fatigue syndrome, contact your disability attorney at Hoglund Law. We can evaluate your case to help determine if your condition meets the criteria that could result in winning your disability benefits from Social Security.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


New Rules for Diabetes and Disability

Many people in America have been diagnosed with diabetes, and now many people find the side effects of their diabetes is preventing them from being able to work in a full-time setting. Most of the diabetes cases the disability attorneys at Hoglund Law handle involve people with peripheral neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy, because of their diabetes. Fortunately, the Social Security Administration is aware of this epidemic and they have recently updated the way they evaluate cases involving diabetes. In June 2014, SSR 14-2p was released, which makes it easier for claimants and representatives to evaluate whether the medical conditions will find them eligible for disability.

Like any Social Security disability case, you need to prove that you are no longer able to work any full-time job due to your impairments. This means that you are either so physically or mentally limited by the symptoms of your condition that you cannot maintain working full-time, 40 hours per week or more. With this new ruling, Social Security points to some specific symptoms of diabetes. They highlight complications such as diabetic retinopathy, cardiovascular issues such as coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease, kidney disease, and nerve damage, or neuropathy. They also consider symptoms of chronic low blood sugar, such as weakness, sweating, trembling, palpitations, and difficulty concentrating. Applying for disability with diabetes requires documentation from your physician of your blood sugar readings, of the symptoms you experience, and your medication regimen as well.

If your diabetes causes a major effect on one of your body systems, like kidney disease or neuropathy, Social Security may be able to find you disabled on the basis of the severely decreased functioning of just that body system. For example, if you are unable to walk without needing the use of a walker or crutches because of neuropathy in your feet, that may be sufficient to find you disabled. Similarly, if your diabetes has had such a severe effect on your kidneys that you require dialysis, they may find you disabled.

Social Security will evaluate what an impact your diabetes has had on your total body, and how it affects your daily functioning if they can’t find it has had a severe impact on one body system. They then determine whether the total impairments would prevent you from doing any of your previous work, and then they need to find if there is other work you would be able to do with your impairments.

If you find that the side effects interfere with your ability to work full-time, call the disability attorneys at Hoglund Law. We can evaluate your case to see if you may be eligible for disability benefits from Social Security.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


VA benefits and Social Security

Just as Social Security has both a Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. The Veterans Administration (VA) has two programs as well. They are VA disability compensation and VA pension. Can you file from both entities you ask, yes! We will go over that and what programs can go together. As well as some of the differences between the programs that warrant mentioning.

Service-connected VA disability benefits or VA disability compensation as it is also called, is not an income base program. So it would be similar to the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program which is based on work credits (monies that you paid in while employed). So then it follows, that non- service connected VA benefits also known as VA pension is income based and would be along the same lines as the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program of Social Security. If eligible, the best case scenario would be to qualify for SSDI and VA disability compensation as this give you the greatest monetary outcome.

Some of the differences between the two are that for the VA there are percentages of disability, where Social Security has an either you are or are not disabled approach. One of the major differences is the “treating physician rule.” Under Social Security law, once the claimant’s doctor is recognized as the treating physician, his or her medical opinion is given more weight and can be the difference between winning and losing your disability case. Whereas, under VA law the doctor’s opinion is not given more weight but instead equal weight with the rest of the evidence in the file. So under VA law, your disability is decided upon the totality of your file.

So as you can see, you would be able to file for both a VA disability benefit and a Social Security disability benefit at the same time. Along with some of the similarities and differences between the two providing entities. I would like to leave you with this thought. If you are wondering if there is a way to have better odds for success, then read on. If you have been given a high (70% or higher) VA rating, you are more likely to also be successful on your Social Security claim. Also while the VA only considers service-connected disabilities, Social Security will consider all disabilities service-connected or not. Unfortunately, if you are found disabled by Social Security first, it will not be given much weight toward your VA claim for disability.

 

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


What is Disabled Widow or Widower’s Benefits?

Disabled Widow or Widower’s Benefits is a program that allows individuals to receive Social Security Disability based upon a deceased spouse’s earnings record. This program is intended for surviving spouses that were not the main provider for the family.

Generally, to be eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits a claimant needs to have paid into Social Security and have earned enough work credits in the right quarters to have technical eligibility.   Disabled Widow or Widower’s Benefits allows claimants that normally would not be eligible on their own record, to file for Social Security Disability benefits under their deceased spouse’s earnings record. This comes up in cases where the surviving spouse acted as the stay home provider for the family.

Additionally, this program is beneficial for claimants that are eligible for Social Security Disability on their own record, but have a smaller earnings record than the deceased spouse. Essentially, the surviving spouse that is found disabled would then collect under the deceased spouse’s earnings. This allows claimants that were not the main provider of the family to receive a greater amount in benefits. This program would not be beneficial in instances where the surviving spouse was the main provider because that individual would simply file under his own record.

To receive these benefits, the surviving spouse must be found disabled within seven years of the deceased spouse’s death and be 50 years old. A surviving spouse can also collect under this program at age 60 without being found disabled.

It is important to understand that marriage can affect the eligibility for Disabled Widow or Widower’s Benefits. If the surviving spouse remarries before the age of 60, then that individual cannot collect under this program.

It is best to speak with an experienced Social Security Disability Attorney on questions regarding Disabled Widow or Widower’s Benefits.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


How Important are Medical Records in My Social Security Benefits Case?

Social Security will consider any existing medical records when deciding your claim. Your initial application to Social Security will indicate the date that you have alleged to be your Onset date of disability. For example, if you note that April 1, 2013 is the date when you became disabled and no longer able to work, social security will review medical records one year prior to the alleged onset date of April 1, 2013. Medical records that reflect ongoing treatment from this date will become the deciding factor for your claim. It is very important that your medical records reflect the condition(s) in which you are applying for benefits.

More often than not, social security will consider other conditions that may exacerbate your primary condition. An example of this would be of listing diabetes as a primary condition and the secondary condition listed as uncontrolled high blood pressure. Upon review, social security will consider the various treatments to control the high blood pressure. This consideration could weigh heavily on the outcome of your claim. Medical records that show a lack of treatment or diagnosis would surely result in a denial.

Lastly and most importantly, having a supportive doctor will increase your chances of a favorable decision. Social Security gives more weight to the opinion of your treating physician than that of a non-physician. So the rule of thumb is to make sure that you are detail in your description of symptoms that you may be experiencing from your condition(s).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


SSI without a Green Card

Certain immigrants may be eligible for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), even though they have not yet obtained citizenship or a green card (lawful permanent residence).

8 U.S.C. section 1612(a)(2) provides, among other things, that the following individuals are not precluded from receiving SSI by reason of their status:

-A refugee under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1157];

-One who is granted asylum under section 208 of such Act [8 U.S.C. 1158];

-One whose deportation is withheld under section 243(h) of such Act [8 U.S.C. 1253] (as in effect immediately before the effective date of section 307 of division C of Public Law 104–208) or section 241(b)(3) of such Act [8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)] (as amended by section 305(a) of division C of Public Law 104–208);

-A Cuban and Haitian entrant (as defined in section 501(e) of the Refugee Education Assistance Act of 1980);

-An Amerasian immigrant pursuant to section 584 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1988 (as contained in section 101(e) of Public Law 100–202 and amended by the 9th proviso under migration and refugee assistance in title II of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1989, Public Law 100–461, as amended).

However, eligibility under section 1612(a)(2) only applies for the first seven years after the above status becomes effective. Social Security must notify those receiving benefits of the date that his or her 7 year period ends, and the recipient may appeal the termination of benefits.

Eligibility for SSI involves several more medical and non-medical criteria, and any applicant should explore the opportunity to enlist the help of an experienced Social Security Disability attorney. For residency status issues, an immigration attorney should be consulted.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Pancreatitis and Disability

Pancreatitis, or inflammation of the pancreas, is a condition that may either be acute, having a short and severe episode, or chronic, with frequent flare-ups. The main symptoms are abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Because of the pancreatitis, someone might also have unexplained weight loss, or may develop diabetes. For most people, these episodes are manageable, but for others, it may be so severe as to interfere with their daily functioning and result in a permanent disability.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) does not have specific rules or listings for pancreatitis. It is evaluated on how the symptoms from the disease affect your daily activities. Social Security Ruling 14-3p sets out guidelines to how they evaluate disorders similar to pancreatitis. First, they will consider the medical evidence that supports the diagnosis. Next, they will consider the effect your disease has on your body, and whether those symptoms meet a Listing for disability. For example, if your pancreatitis has caused you to lose weight, your weight loss may be evaluated to see if you meet Listing 5.08, and if the SSA finds your condition meets those guidelines, you may be found disabled. If they don’t find your condition meets a Listing, then they evaluate the combined effect of the condition and the effect it has on your physical activities and your limitations because of it.

Of course, a condition like pancreatitis affects everyone differently, and your symptoms may be different from others. If you have other conditions in addition to the pancreatitis, those conditions will be evaluated in a similar way for SSA to find how it affects you and your daily functioning.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Transferability of Job Skills

An important part of the Social Security Disability analysis arises, especially if the claimant is over 50, as to whether the person has obtained skills from his or her prior work that could transfer into an easier, less demanding job. SSR 82-41 explains the concepts of “skills” and “transferability of skills” and clarifies how these concepts are used.

Skill is defined as knowledge of a work activity which requires the exercise of significant judgment that goes beyond the carrying out of simple job duties and is acquired through performance of an occupation which is above the unskilled level (requires more than 30 days to learn). It is practical and familiar knowledge of the principles and processes of an art, science or trade, combined with the ability to apply them in practice in a proper and approved manner. This includes activities like making precise measurements, reading blueprints, and setting up and operating complex machinery. A skill gives a person a special advantage over unskilled workers in the labor market.

Transferability is defined as applying work skills which a person has demonstrated in vocationally relevant past jobs to meet the requirements of other skilled or semiskilled jobs. Transferability is distinct from the usage of skills recent learned in school which may serve as a basis for direct entry into skilled work.

SSR 82-41 also explains the difference between a “skill” and a “trait” explaining that the qualities of “alertness,” “coordination and dexterity with the use of hands or feet for the rapid performance of repetitive work tasks” are traits and not skills. “It is the acquired capacity to perform the work activities with facility (rather than the traits themselves) that gives rise to potentially transferable skills.

Finally, SSR 82-41 specifically provides that the ALJ set forth findings of fact regarding the issue of transferability of skills. SSR 82-41 states “When the issue of skills and their transferability must be decided, the adjudicator or ALJ is required to make certain findings of fact and include them in the written decision. Findings should be supported with appropriate documentation. When a finding is made that a claimant has transferable skills, the acquired work skills must be identified, and specific occupations to which the acquired work skills are transferable must be cited in the State agency’s determination or ALJ’s decision. Evidence that these specific skills or semiskilled jobs exist in significant numbers in the national economy should be included (the regulation take administrative notice only of the existence of unskilled sedentary, light, and medium jobs in the national economy).

Transferability of skills is an important part of the disability analysis and can potentially lead to a denial. It is the last step in the disability analysis to decide whether someone should be determined Disabled. Vocational expert testimony is extremely important and can seem to vary based off who is testifying. Having an experienced attorney represent you who knows the regulations and the right questions to ask during cross examination can potentially make the difference between winning or losing a claim for benefits.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Failure to Follow Perscribed Treatment

From time to time the issue of whether the claimant failed to follow prescribed treatment becomes the focal point. 20 CFR 404.1530 states “an individual who would otherwise be found to be under a disability, but who fails without justifiable causes to follow treatment prescribed by a treating source which the Social Security Administration determines can be expected to restore the individual’s ability to work, cannot by virtue of such ‘failure’ be found to be under a disability.” SSR 82-59 further expands on this definition declaring that the SSA may make a determination that an individual has failed to follow prescribed treatment only where all of the following conditions exist:

1. The evidence establishes that the individual’s impairment precludes engaging in any substantial gainful activity (SGA) or, in the case of a disabled widow(er) that the impairment meets or equals the Listing of Impairments in Appendix 1 of Regulations No. 4, Subpart P; and

2. The impairment has lasted or is expected to last for 12 continuous months from onset of disability or is expected to result in death; and

3. Treatment which is clearly expected to restore capacity to engage in any SGA (or gainful activity, as appropriate) has been prescribed by a treating source; and

4. The evidence of record discloses that there has been refusal to follow prescribed treatment.

A few things here are important to note. First off, the treatment must be prescribed by the treating source. The treating source must be a medical professional who attends to the claimant’s medical needs on a regular basis. Thus, a doctor the SSA sends the claimant to for a consultative examination cannot determine a claimant to be denied for failure to follow prescribed treatment. In addition, the prescribed treatment must be expected to restore the ability to work. In a recent case I had, I got the doctor to testify that even if the claimant gave up smoking, her heart and lung condition would not improve enough to restore her ability to work.

If the SSA determines the treatment was prescribed by a treating source and it would be expected to restore the ability to work, it must then give the claimant the chance to offer an explanation as to why they did not follow the prescribed treatment. The SSA’s then determines whether the given explanation was “justifiable”. SSR 82-59 provides a list of possible justifiable explanations. A few, but not all, examples include: If treatment is contrary to religious belief (with documentation of membership to the religious affiliation along with statements from the church authorities), the inability to afford prescribed treatment and there are no community resources available (all possible resources should be explored and documented by the claimant), another treating source advises against the treatment prescribed by another source, the treatment involves a high degree of risk or amputation. These are but a few examples.

Failure to follow prescribed treatment can be a devastating reason for a denial. The SSA has determined the claimant cannot work yet they get denied benefits and insurance. It is very helpful to have an experienced attorney during the lengthy process in order to advise the claimant about the proper actions to take when a doctor offers treatment as well as possible community resources available to the claimant so they can follow the prescribed treatment. At the hearing, or in a brief, it is again helpful to have an experienced attorney who has an understanding of the federal regulations in order to rebut the SSA’s denial or contemplation of denying a person for failure to follow prescribed treatment. With proper counsel and advocacy from an experienced attorney, a claimant can avoid being denied due to failure to follow prescribed treatment.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Will I have to speak at my disability hearing?

An administrative hearing is held if the claimant is denied Social Security Disability benefits at the Initial and Reconsideration levels.  The hearing is held at a local Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) and is presided over by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).  The hearing is statistically the best opportunity to get approved for disability benefits.

Many claimants wonder, “Do I have speak to the judge myself, or will my attorney do all the talking?”

The answer is that you should fully expect to talk to the ALJ.  One of the reasons the hearing is the best opportunity to get approved is because the ALJ has an opportunity to meet you and get your perspective before making a decision on your case.  At previous administrative levels, the adjudicators never meet the claimant.  At the hearing, the claimant is face to face with the person making the decision, giving them the opportunity to ask any questions they have about the case.

Do not worry.  You will not be asked to present legal theories or define complicated medical terms.  That is for your attorney to deal with.  The ALJ will most likely ask you questions about your day to day activities, trying to get an understanding on how your medical impairments limit your daily life.  He/She might also ask you to describe your symptoms and how they affect your physical and mental abilities.  Your answers will help the ALJ make a more accurate decision.  Your attorney will also have a chance to ask you questions that he/she wants emphasize regarding your disabilities.

The best advice to give to a claimant is simple: be honest.  The ALJ will get your testimony at the hearing and then review your medical records in light of the new testimony.  If what you say at the hearing makes sense with what is in the medical records, your testimony can go a long way toward a favorable decision.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Compassionate Allowance Diseases: Sandhoff Disease

The Social Security Administration established the Compassionate Allowances program in an attempt to expedite cases where individuals have medical conditions that are very severe and would qualify under one of the listings. However, not all diseases are met under a specific listing, but still may be approved under the CAL.

Sandhoff disease is a rare inherited disorder that progressively destroys nerve cells (neurons) in the brain and spinal cord.[1] There is no cure for Sandhoff disease.  Treatment includes supportive care for symptoms, such as medications to control seizures and nutritional and respiratory support.[2] Onset of this disease can occur at any age. Adult/Late-onset Sandhoff disease typically presents in adolescence or adulthood, and symptoms may include: Progressive muscle weakness, clumsiness and gait disturbances, speech and swallowing difficulties, urinary incontinence, and psychosis.[3]

Sandhoff disease may be evaluated under Listing 110.08B under catastrophic congenital abnormality or disease. SSA suggests genetic testing for a mutation in the HEXB gene, and a clinical description of the physical and developmental features for approval.[4] If definitive genetic testing is not available, the results of other laboratory studies such as enzyme assays, molecular cell analysis, and tissue biopsy can be substituted.[5]

 

[1] https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/sandhoff-disease

[2] Bley AE, et al. Natural History of Infantile GM2 Gangliosidosis. Pediatrics 2011;128;e1233

[3] Delnooz, CCS et al. New cases of adult-onset Sandhoff disease with a cerebellar or lower motor neuron phenotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 81:968-972

[4] https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/poms.nsf/lnx/0423022295

[5] Id.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Its Role in an Administrative Hearing

Lefmaging (MRI), computerized tomography (CT) or by a nuclear medical scan.2

There are numerous symptoms that could notify a doctor to order one of these tests-including, but not limited to: shortness of breath, persistent coughing, a build-up of fluid (edema), fatigue, and/or chest pain.3 These symptoms also play an impact on a social security disability claim. For example, a person with shortness of breath may have difficulty walking long distances or have difficulty lifting. An administrative law judge analyzes a person’s case by reviewing all the medical data, which would include both a person’s symptoms and also the objective evidence (i.e. an echocardiogram).

In determining if a person is disabled, an administrative law judge reviews the “Listing of Impairments” and compares the medical evidence with the listings. For a person with a low left ventricular ejection fraction, the administrative law judge will compare the claimant’s percentage to what is discussed in the listings. The judge will review the listings under section 4.00: Cardiovascular System. In section 4.02 it discusses if a person has severe ejection fraction of 30% or lower and has one of three: persistent symptoms of heart failure, three or more separate episodes of acute congestive heart failure within 12 months, or an inability to perform a stress test at 5 METs or less due various reasons.4 If an administrative law judge finds that all criteria are met in the listing, a favorable decision is granted.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Things you might want to Know About a Social Security VTC Hearing

A Social Security hearing can be stressful enough, without adding pieces that you might not understand! So let’s see if we can explain what a VTC hearing is? How a VTC hearing is different than a non VTC hearing? What you need to do when you receive your VTC notice and what most people are concerned with, will it speed up how long you have to wait for a hearing?

VTC stands for video teleconferencing. It means that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for your hearing will not be in the same location as you. This allows more hearing to be scheduled in your area by borrowing Judges from other areas that might not have as many hearing scheduled.

The Judge will be live on a monitor. You and your representative will be able to communicate with the Judge in real time and the Judge will be able to see what is happening at your location as well. Also any experts that are needed for your hearing, could be at either location.

You will receive a VTC letter from Social Security when you reach the hearing level of your claim. This letter is to notify you that your hearing might be done by video teleconference. The letter does not mean you will have a video teleconference hearing! If you are totally against having your hearing done by video teleconference, then you will need to complete the form that came along with the letter and return it to Social Security within the 30 day time frame. If you have a good reason for not getting it back in the 30 day time frame, Social Security may give you a 30 day extension.

By being willing to have your hearing done by video teleconference, your hearing could possibly be scheduled sooner than the National average waiting period. At this time, the National average time frame at the hearing level is 16-18 months for your hearing to be scheduled. This letter is not a guarantee that you will be scheduled sooner but, it leaves all the options open.

So as you can see, the video teleconference hearing is not must different than a regular hearing. The Judge and possibly the experts are at a different location than you and your representative. As for the letter, if you are not against a video teleconference hearing, then just put the VTC letter with the other paperwork that you received from Social Security. You only need to respond if you do not want a VTC hearing. In conclusion, by being willing to have a hearing done by VTC; you are giving yourself the most options to have your hearing scheduled sooner if it is possible. Hopefully this helps to lessen the stress due to the unknown aspects of the VTC hearing versus the non-video teleconference hearing.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Why Should I Complete Physical Therapy?

Physical therapy is designed to help an individual rebuild or strength their injured body part. Physical therapy is also designed to help individual decrease joint stiffness. Physical therapy may be painful in order to help individuals to get better. This article will cover reasons why individuals should complete a round of physical therapy.

One of the best reasons to complete physical therapy is because the physical therapy may increase the range of motion of a joint. This increased range of motion of a joint will help with the pain. In addition, along with increased range of motion, the individual is likely to have less stiffness.

Another reason to complete physical therapy is to learn different techniques that will help relieve pain. If an individual is having back pain, one of the techniques that physical therapy teaches you is on how to stretch the muscles. The stretching of the muscles and to what degree is all part of physical therapy. By completing the round of physical therapy, an individual will have a better understanding on what they are able and not able to do.

Another reason to complete physical therapy is to learn different ways on completing task. This is especially important on back pain. Individuals with back pain are retaught on how to lift without engaging the back muscles and instead use the legs to lift. The more an individual learns on how to lift, the less likely the individual will reinjure the back.

In conclusion, it is important to complete physical therapy. Even though the physical therapy may be painful, the usefulness of physical therapy out weights the pain. In addition, regular physical therapy gets easier for individuals and becomes less painful as time continues. In other words, the first days of physical therapy are the worst days and then it typically gets better as the stiffness leaves the joint.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Keeping a Seizure History or Diary

If you are filing a claim for Social Security Disability benefits based on a Seizure Disorder, the main question that arises when analyzing the claim is the frequency of seizures occurring. Some claimants will go to the Emergency Room for certain seizures, but not for every seizure that occurs. Therefore, medical records do not always tell the complete story. One thing that you can do for yourself that may have a positive impact on your claim is by keeping a seizure diary. Make sure to document the dates and times that you experienced a seizure, if the seizure was witnessed by another person, if you lost consciousness, how long the seizure lasted for, and how you felt after experiencing the seizure. Also, be sure to note how long it took for you to “recover” from the seizure (such as having to lie down and sleep for two hours). The more thorough your entries are, the more helpful your seizure diary can be. Seizure diaries, in addition to your medical records, can help clarify how often you are experiencing seizures, how often the seizures last for, and how you have felt after you experience a seizure. This can be helpful information not only for yourself, but your attorney, and ultimately an Administrative Law Judge that is deciding your case.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Why is a Medical Expert at my Hearing?

There is a possibility that a medical expert will be present at your hearing. This medical expert is present as a neutral expert, and will be assisting in helping the Administrative Law Judge understand the medical diagnosis and conditions outlined in your medical records. This will be a doctor that has not examined you before, and will be basing their opinions solely on the review of your medical records. This is why it is important to notify your attorney of all medical clinics and hospital visits you have had in the relevant time period at question, so that your medical records are up to date for the medical expert to review.

The medical expert will be providing testimony whether in their opinion your conditions either meet or equal Social Security’s medical criteria (“The Listings of Impairments”) for being found disabled. If the medical expert finds that you do not necessarily meet or equal a listing, the expert will identify any functional limitations that they deem necessary in a work-setting based on their review of the medical records. At the hearing your attorney will have the opportunity to cross-examine the medical expert to further determine work-related limitations.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Benefits cut off for Nazi Holocaust Perpetrators

In October 2014, Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY) and Congressman Leonard Lance (R-NJ) announced their support of a bill to terminate the Social Security benefits along with any other federal benefits of Nazi war criminals. The No Social Security for Nazis Act was introduced to Congress by Congressman Sam Jonson (R-TX), in mid-November. It was passed by the House of Representatives December 2, 2014 and the Senate on December 4, 2014, unanimously by both. The President signed it into law December 18, 2014.

The Act closes a loophole allowing Nazi Holocaust perpetrators to collect millions in Social Security benefits. The loophole existed because rather than going through formal deportation proceedings which would cut off federal benefits, they voluntarily renounced their citizenship in a settlement with the Attorney General related to participating in Nazi persecution. Before this act, US law mandated a “final order of deportation” before federal benefits were terminated.

According to the Associated Press, since 1979, 38 of 66 suspects removed from the United States kept their Social Security benefits. While the Justice Department denies using the tactic to expel Nazi perpetrators from the US, the AP reported that it was likely used that way. The perpetrators benefits would continue if they signed a settlement agreement with the Justice Department or fled before deportation proceeding were completed. They would be expelled quickly to a country that could prosecute them for their crimes. https://goo.gl/xEFB3F

The Act also, ensures that Nazi war criminals cannot receive spousal benefits, due to a marriage to a Social Security beneficiary. A spouse may receive benefits, even if he or she has not worked, if the person is at least 62 years of age and you are receiving or are eligible for retirement or disability benefits. https://goo.gl/Sa3CBp

The Attorney General must certify to the Ways and Means Committee and the Finance Committee of Congress that Social Security has been notified of all those that this criteria. The Commissioner of Social Security Administration must certify to the Ways and Means and Finance Committees that benefits were terminated. You can see the full Act here: https://goo.gl/cC5RbS

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Disability and Cystic Fibrosis

Recently, I represented a 10-year-old girl diagnosed with cystic fibrosis. According to the Mayo Clinic, cystic fibrosis is a “life-threatening disorder that causes severe damage to the lungs and digestive system…it affects the cells that produce the mucus, sweat, and digestive juices.”1 My client battled with breathing, producing phlegm, maintaining her weight, and staying healthy among other symptoms. In addition, she requires numerous daily breathing treatments that take her out of the classroom and away from her studies. Her condition and symptoms could result in her being found disabled.

In my client’s claim, and in all claims, Social Security will look at the medical evidence to determine the impairments and the severity of the impairments. There are three arguments that could be made for my client: one, she meet’s listing 103.04 (Cystic Fibrosis Listing), which is that she meets the very specific criteria to be approved; two, that is she is markedly impaired under at least two of six domains; or three, she is extremely impaired in one domain.

Since my client’s medical evidence did not support the required evidence of a listing, we argued that she marked in two domains. Specifically, we argued she was marked in domains two: attending and completing tasks and six: health and physical well-being. In domain two, the child is out of the classroom three times a day receiving breathing treatments. In addition, whenever she has an breathing attack and required further treatment she again is outside the classroom; this occurs at least one or two more times a week. The client is unable to participate in any physical activities and is not learning in those settings. She is continually falling behind in her school work due to nurse visits, not being able to participate, and absences. In domain six, this child had numerous visits to the school nurse, she has been to the emergency room countless times, had pneumonia in the last six months and in the period of her filing date had three hospitalizations. The doctors were concerned with her ability to thrive and grow. The medical records did strongly reflect this child’s struggle with her health.

Due to the severity cystic fibrosis has on a child’s life, seeking disability is warranted.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Consultative Examinations. What is the Purpose?

When you filed a claim for Social Security Disability did you think that you might have to see one of Social Security’s doctors? Well many people have asked just that question and have been surprised by the array of answers that have come from this simple question. I will address the reasons that you might be asked to go to a consultative exam. Just a side note, Social Security Consultative exams (CE) come in two flavors. The physical CE and the psychological CE.

Some people have asked, why they would need to see a Social Security doctor if Social Security already has their medical records. Does that mean that they do not believe my doctor? Usually if they have asked you to go to a physical consultative exam, it is more than likely that they needed further medical assistance in making a decision on your claim. It could be that the medical records were not clear enough to make a decision. You can help here! By letting your doctor know at each visit what is still ailing you. Along with what has gotten better or worse pertaining to your disabilities. Like painting a picture of your disability, if you will. It is not that Social Security does not believe your doctor, it has more to do with the medical records they received from your doctor not being a clear picture of the disability you have claimed.

Another question that arises often when it comes to Consultative Exams is why a claimant might be asked to go to a Psychological CE when the disabilities they are claiming are all physical? Some of the reasons that Social Security psychological CE may be requested of the claimant are if one of the medications you are currently taking is usually prescribed for a psychological ailment. Or if you have memory issues, have suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI), or if there is mention in your medical records that you suffer from anxiety. This is not a complete list of reasons for a psychological exam to be requested of you but, you can get an idea of why it might happen to you.

If you have wondered if you must to go to this exam and if so, who is paying for it? The answer to the first part is that it is in your best interest to go to the exams that Social Security requests you to attend and if Social Security has requested that you go, then they will be picking up the tab for the exam. It should also be noted that, just because you have gone an exam that Social Security requested you still need to continue treatment with your own doctors throughout the Social Security process. The Social Security doctors are for further clarification of your disabilities. Where your doctor’s are for continuous treatment of those disabilities.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →