What Happens at a Social Security Hearing? Chapter 2

Chapter 2

The Diagnosis.

 

Thursday, October 16, 2008. 

Office of Dr. James Strickland.  Neurology.  10:15 a.m.

 

“Well, Denise.  I looked at your MRI results.  You and your husband were worried about your coordination issues.”  In Dr. Strickland’s voice, still new to her, something was wrong.

They were sitting in Dr. Strickland’s office.  Happy faces looked out from family pictures on his walls and desk.  In the picture closest to Denise, the doctor smiled broadly, holding a big fish.

But now, in his office, the doctor’s 50’s-something face looked solemn, etched, and far away.  He brought out a color picture.  Her MRI, she thought.

He held up her MRI and touched it with his pen in the middle.  His voice became mechanical, clinical, as if he were reading instructions.  “This is the c-spine MRI we ordered.  I took a look at it earlier this morning.  The radiologist already interpreted it.”  His touched his pen to the MRI.  “This is your cervical spine.  This is your spinal cord.”  He drew in a short breath.  Denise shifted forward.

“See these spots here?”  He tapped his pen up and down the MRI.  “These are lesions on your cervical spinal cord.”

Her heart quickened.  Did he say lesions?  Denise thought.  Cancer?  She looked at her husband.  He was staring intently at the MRI, mouth slightly open.

“From what I can tell, these lesions are the early signs of multiple sclerosis.  The radiologist agrees.”  The doctor stared directly at Denise.  Denise was struck cold and motionless.

“What?  MS?”  Her voice failed her.  She half-whispered, “Are you sure?”

“Yes, Ms. Johnson.  These spots show demyelination in a pattern unique to MS.  We’ll do more testing.  We’ll definitely need a spinal tap.”  Did he say spinal tap?  “But the non-invasive testing we’ve done so far, such as coordination tests, support this diagnosis, too.”  He pointed to her side.  “Especially your right arm.”

He then placed a finger to his eyes.  “And your vision issues are associated with what’s called optic neuritis, a common MS symptom.”  He took a breath.  “I’m sorry.”  The words lingered like black ribbons in the air.  No smiles.  No vacation.  Nothing happy.  Darkness around me.

Denise stared back and forth blankly at the two men.  They looked at her and said nothing.  She spoke to the ceiling light.  “MS?  How could I get MS?”  Then she looked at the doctor.  “Can it go away?  Can I take medications?”

“MS, once confirmed, is not curable.  We can stall it, sometimes for years, but it gradually becomes more symptomatic.  The medications, if covered, do have side-effects.”  The rest of the appointment, questions about insurance, medications, treatment, and other particulars were swept away in her private, spinning tunnel.  MS?  She felt so alone.  Am I going to die?  Hands on her face under her veil of long brown curly hair, she quietly sobbed.  Her head shook slightly, uncontrollably.  Trapped.

Hands touched her forearms.  Warm, muffled words came in assuring tones.  More apologies.  Appointment over.  Her husband and nurse guided her out.  Aseptic smells of rubbing alcohol wafted in and out.  Strange, sad eyes tracked her through the waiting room.  The car ride home was numb and quiet.  She sat at the kitchen table.

Soon, she took a fitful nap.  She awakened later and looked out her bedroom window.  Dusk.  She heard her girls murmuring outside the bedroom door.  “Mom needs time,” her husband quietly told them.  The sounds of voices trailed away.  Her cheeks were tight with dried tears.

Alone with MS.  So alone.

In the long nights that followed those days, Denise had dreams of when she was a child.  It was summer at the cabin.  She was at the lakeshore at an isolated swimming hole.  It was mid-afternoon.  Bright sunlight danced overhead.  A warm breeze brushed her arms.  Broad groups of white clouds hung tightly against the bright blue sky.

In one quick movement, her boy cousins grabbed her by the arms and legs and threw her into the lake.  They were laughing.  She couldn’t swim.

The rush of cold water made her small, 5-year-old heart pound.  Her arms and legs, flaying in panic, scrambled for mooring.  Her feet stepped up an invisible ladder.  She turned her body toward shore and went deeper underwater.  She breathed in water.  Bubbles surrounding her offered no air.  Her cousins yelled for her.  Parts of her name registered deep within her.  Flits of light and brown cedar water rushed above her head.

Then Denise would wake up, scared and sweating.

 

A few months into her diagnosis, work proved more difficult.  Coworkers stopped talking when she walked by, looking like they felt guilty to be happy.  She made more mistakes, including a few brushes with missed deadlines.  Her close friends helped her complete reports, while those less close to her became less friendly.  Sick days came more often, often without warning.  Denise was falling behind.

One night in bed, her husband turned on his bedside light, sat up, and looked at her sternly.  “The doctor told us that stress is makin’ your MS worse, and you just aren’t the same.  I don’t want that freakin’ hospital stealin’ your health from you.  It’s not worth it.”

Surprised but tired, Denise answered, “What about money?  Don’t we need my income?”

“Maybe I’ll become shift supervisor.”  He said it, but his voice betrayed him.  His factory job was the best he could get in their small Minnesota town, but hard work was only rewarded with more work.  “We’ll save more.”  They already cut expenses.  A lot.  He added, “The girls could use you at home after school.  And you could do things around the house when you are up to it.”  Neither knew what she would be “up” to doing.  Neither asked.

At least his job gave them medical insurance.  But the lean cords of survival tightened.  And despite cutting expenses, they juggled surges of bills, calling for more time on late ones.  Savings were meager.  Their two daughters were in high school.  College was a dark cloud overhead that no one dared to look up and see.

With Denise and her husband committed to her staying home, Denise went to her appointments, took Rebif injections, had good periods, and suffered through difficult relapses.  She learned how to moderate her activity, planning errands over different days.  She did chores as she could, getting help when she could get it.

Her relapses, however, stole more coordination – bit by bit – each round.

Her husband got overtime hours when he could.  Her daughters pitched in around the house, sometimes making dinner.  Denise thought they were good kids, but they were too young for the weight they carried.  This, in turn, weighed on her.

Mundane errands became walls.  Grocery shopping was impossible for her to do alone.  Her close friends called and visited.  But some days, she didn’t want to answer the phone.  She sat alone at the kitchen table.  She was tired and stressed.  Life for her became cold coffee that she had to swallow.

In the darker afternoons of the shorter winter days, she sat at the table and cried.

Fatigue, a frequent intruder, stole her energy and lurked behind her every movement.  Her eyes felt heavy.

But help was coming.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


What Happens at a Social Security Hearing? Prelude and Chapter 1

A Legal Story

[The following chapters are part of a series that explains what happens before, during, and after a Social Security hearing from an experienced Social Security benefits attorney.  Client names and particular fact patterns were changed to protect confidentiality.]

Prelude

Monday, June 3, 2013.  Johnson’s House.  Mid-afternoon.

Sitting alone at her kitchen table, Denise was worried.  A rhythm of raindrops caressed the window screen.  Fall colors filtered through the window, casting stained glass shapes onto the tile floor.

What would her Social Security hearing be like?  What could she say to a judge?  She’d been out of work so long.  “Five years?” she muttered to herself.  And now, for two years, she’d worried about her Social Security hearing.  It was next week.

Her soft brown eyes reddened.  It was about all she could bear.  What if she lost?  Will we lose the house?

With her unsteady left hand, she took a small sip of coffee.  She choked as it went down the wrong way.

Chapter 1

The Mug

October, 2008. 

It was a rainy Monday morning.  Green was giving way to orange and yellow on the leaves of the trees.  Denise did not mind her part-time accounts receivable job in the billing department of the county hospital.  Although it was repetitive, it brought home money to pay the expanding bills while the girls were in school.

She rubbed and squinted her eyes.  The columns of numbers on her computer monitor were blurry.  She never wore glasses, she thought.  Are my eyes going?  She felt dizzy.  The flu?   She felt her head.  No temperature.  She looked around.  Her friends were at work, their glazed eyes fixed to computer monitors.  Each were bored but busy in their pale gray fabric work cubicles.

She was tired.  Dead tired.  She looked up at the hallway clock.  Just past 10 a.m.  Only 10?  She heard the red second hand ticking.

And she was weak, more on her right side than her left.  She lifted up her right arm and turned her palm up toward her.  Maybe she had overdone it yesterday.  She mentally went through a checklist of her activities the day before.  X’s on her pinned-up calendar announced days already past.  Yes, yesterday was Sunday.  It’s only Monday?  Why does it feel like later in the week?  Her weakness was different, as if it came from the inside.

Had I eaten breakfast?  She felt a little nauseous.  The coffee in her yellow smiling face mug was cold and half-empty.  She looked at it.  Today, its smile mocked her.

I’ve been clumsy these days, too.  She looked under her desk at her right foot.  She had taken off her right shoe once she got to work.  In the shower, she noticed her right little toe was black and swollen from jamming it into a kitchen chair the day before.

Man, that throbs.  I hope I didn’t break it, she thought.  Maybe I could get an x-ray during lunch from Joe in radiology.  She winced, held her breath, and carefully wiggled her toe.

A half hour later, she felt a strong wave of nausea and odd crawling sensations in her right arm.

She questioned herself again.  Did I get enough sleep?  Her boss had been pressing her department to work faster.  She looked at her right hand.  Carpal tunnel?  Her friend Sandy had that last year.  She bent her right wrist inward.  I don’t want to have release surgery like she had.

A peculiar tingling sensation went through her body, like a hot, itchy electric wire was turned on and was fed down into her right arm.  Her body, in some way, wasn’t hers.  What the hell did I do? 

The second hand ticked more.

 

The next morning, Denise made coffee for her and her husband.  Clumsy movements.  Jamming fingers.  Nausea.  Sore right toe.  Electric jolts shot into her right arm.  She spilled coffee grinds on the counter past the coffee filter.  “Damn,” she muttered under her breath.

When the brew cycle completed, she poured a cup of black coffee for her husband.  With her right hand, she extended it to him.  His ceramic mug paused in the air between them.  He looked at her funny, catching her glance before they both looked at her right hand.

Something was different.  Time slowed down.

Sensing her right arm was weak, she tried to strengthen her grip.   No response.  Their bridge of arms collapsed between them.  In slow motion, she watched her right hand loosen.  The mug came out.  She couldn’t react, just watch.  With a loud crash, pieces of ceramic and black coffee splattered across the tile floor.  Circles of steam rose up and encircled their feet.

That morning, her right arm was not hers.  And she was tired, so tired.  Denise needed to find out what was wrong.  Soon, she would.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Social Security Disability

According to the Mayo Clinic, Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is chronic inflammation and deep lesions of the skin, particularly in sensitive areas of the armpits and groin.  Possible causes are thought to involve a combination of genetics, hormones, and other factors.  HS may impact 1-2% of the population, but absolute numbers are uncertain.

Given how relatively rare this medical condition is, our attorneys at Hoglund Law Offices have successfully represented a surprising number of clients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Social Security Disability benefits claims.  Our clients have typically worked for over ten years or more with symptoms before succumbing to the progressive lesions and pain despite surgical intervention.

How does Social Security Disability evaluate Hidradenitis Suppurativa?  Social Security verifies the diagnosis first.  In my experience, records usually carry ongoing primary care treatment for recurring boils that require in-office lancing.  Of concern, I have seen some medical record histories that initially fail to specifically diagnose HS until these lesions have persisted in various forms and locations for a few years.  There are possible reasons for this that I address below.

Social Security reviews Hidradenitis Suppurativa claims under a special definition of disability called a listing.  Here is the “listing” that Social Security applies to claims based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa:

Listing 8.06

Hidradenitis suppurativa, with extensive skin lesions involving both axillae, both inguinal areas or the perineum that persist for at least 3 months despite continuing treatment as prescribed.

How do our Social Security disability attorneys at Hoglund Law Offices get approvals at Social Security hearings for clients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa?  In our experience, the timing of the diagnosis may be an issue.  I argue to judges that the nature of the HS lesions may not, in themselves, manifest themselves to physicians initially – particularly if my clients see different primary care physicians from appointment to appointment or change facilities from time to time.  Over time, however, the diagnosis of HS should relate back to previous care for the symptoms.  Our attorneys can offer advice to get retrospective input from these physicians.

Deficiencies in the medical evidence of HS may relate to the location of the lesions.  My clients may attempt to suffer through a period of HS lesions in private areas of their bodies.  Despite the Social Security Administration’s assumptions, it is not always easy to seek care for personally sensitive problems.  I argue to judges that a delay in diagnosis, in these instances, has more to do with social factors.  Reporting the full constellation of symptoms right away has been difficult for some of my clients.

What should your Social Security Disability attorney know about Hidradenitis Suppurativa?  In my experience, it is common to have judges and medical experts who are unfamiliar with HD.  I understand that Social Security judges must review many kinds of medical claims.  I speculate that medical experts (ME’s) at hearings, however, may not be as familiar (and miss) Hidradenitis Suppurativa because it is a dermatological condition that may not normally arise in other specialty areas.

What must your Social Security disability attorney do at your Social Security hearing?  He or she must raise the issue of Listing 8.06 and point out the diagnosis, duration, location, impact, and daily care duties that impede full-time employment.  Additional legal documentation has proven helpful in our clients’ claims.  Call us at Hoglund Law Offices today if you are interested in the experience our Social Security attorneys can offer you to apply or appeal your Social Security Disability claim.

Andrew Kinney, Esq.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


An Alternative Treatment for Arthritis

A procedure known as platelet rich plasma, or PRP injections, are being used to alleviate arthritis and other joint pain.  Avivia Gianetti is an active golfer who is in her late 50s.  However, soreness and pain running down her arms left her unable to play her favorite sport.  Not keen on the idea of surgery, her doctor suggested a new procedure known as PRP.  The procedure allows the patient to be relieved of pain without having to go under the knife.  In the procedure, the patient’s own plasma, a natural nutrient found in blood, is separated from the blood cells and injected into the damaged joints.  The PRP injection helps repair damaged cartilage and joints.

Notable athletes such as Kobe Bryant and Matt Forte have been using PRP to alleviate joint pain; however, baby boomers may want to take advantage of this alternative to surgery as well.  Due to the aging baby boomer population joint replacements are rapidly growing.  Knee replacement surgeries have doubled over the past decade.  Although many experts contend that PRP injections are not a proven substitute for surgery, they may be a good option for some.  Dr. Jazrawi states, “This is certainly, potentially one treatment option that may be utilized, but it’s not the magic bullet.”

Dr. Jazrawi uses the PRP injections most often in the treatment of chronic arthritis.  Patients are able to schedule a quick visit with Dr. Jazrawi to receive the injections.  And more often than not, one quick injection in Dr. Jazrawi’s office will allow a patient to get right back to their active lifestyle.  Dr. Jazrawi notes that PRP should not be the first-line of treatment.  Instead, he suggests that patients maintain an active and healthy lifestyle with dieting and exercise.  There is always a risk in applying new technology, and Dr. Jazrawi asserts that he does not want to apply this new technology in a haphazard manner.

 

Source:

Lara Salahi, Cutting Edge: Joint Injections Heal Baby Boomer Arthritis, https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/cutting-edge-joint-injections-heal-baby-boomer-arthritis/story?id=15214643 (accessed 12/22/2011)

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Beating Type 2 diabetes may be just that simple

In an astounding study presented at Chicago’s Radiological Society of North America, a team from the Leiden University Medical Center found that Type 2 diabetes can be eliminated in patients in just four months.  What is the cure for Type 2 diabetes?  The answer to that question is simpler than you might think.  A low-calorie diet has shown effectively to cure Type 2 diabetes in just four months.

The Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands conducted a study that included seven men and eight women with Type 2 diabetes.  Each subject consumed just 500 calories a day for four months.  At the end of the study, the low-calorie diet effectively eliminated insulin dependence and reduced the amounts of dangerous fats around the heart in all 15 of the patients.  “It is striking to see how a relatively simple intervention of a very low-calorie diet effectively cures Type 2 diabetes,” said lead researcher Sebastian Hammer.

This extreme dieting may have long lasting effects as well.  In a similar study conducted by Newcastle University in the United Kingdom, many patients in the study remained disease free even several months after completing the program and returning to a normal diet.  Although the results of these tests are very promising, doctors warn that this type of therapy is not for everyone, and patients should consult with their doctors before beginning this type of reduced-calorie diet.

 

Source:

Yahoo! News, Reduced-calorie diet could beat diabetes in four months, https://news.yahoo.com/reduced-calorie-diet-could-beat-diabetes-four-months-164141607.html (accessed 12/6/2011)

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Mixed Reviews in light of Social Security Administration’s Changes

Earlier in the year, the Social Security Administration in Baltimore decided to implement changes in the federal disability benefits program to reduce the straining backlog of applications.  The Social Security Administration implemented new medical examination policies, which Social Security Administration spokesman Mark Hinkle contends, “decisions are timelier… but this does not mean we are sacrificing quality for speed.”  However, some doctors have criticized some of the new policies.

New policies resulted in a vast increase in the number of people receiving benefits.  Doctors have been working harder and faster to meet the Social Security Administrations new standards.  The new policy resulted in a pay cut for doctors unless they were able to work faster to get through more cases.  Additionally doctors were required to stray farther from their areas of expertise.  As a result of the policy change, 45 of the 140 doctors working in the Baltimore offices either quit or were fired.

After implementation of the new procedures in Baltimore, eye doctors were assigned back-pain cases, dermatologists reviewed strokes, and gastroenterologists reviewed cases of deafness.  Although doctors receive extensive training in a broad range of cases, some of doctors have not examined certain medical issues in years.  As a result, Dr. Novin notes that some people who shouldn’t be getting benefits are getting it, and some people who should be getting it aren’t getting it.  Dr. Novan, the former chief of surgery at Baltimore’s Harbor Hospital contends that he was fired because he was pressured by a supervisor to change his medical opinion and award benefits when he did not believe the person was prevented from working.

The Social Security Administration previously has tried to improve the medical screening process; however, little success has resulted.  The Social Security Disability program certainly has not been an easy program to fix.  The agency is under extreme political pressure to reduce the backlog of cases, but at the same time, the changes in medical procedures is creating problems of its own.  Whatever, the final consensus is in Baltimore will surely affect the program in the rest of the country.  Many consider the Baltimore the flagship office of the Social Security Disability program.

Source:

Damian Paletta, Doctor Revolt Shakes Disability Program, https://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204621904577016221945984492.html (accessed11/22/2011)

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


6 Questions to Ask before you Hire a Social Security Disability Lawyer

Roseville, MN.  Finding a good lawyer for your Social Security Disability and SSI claim can be difficult.  Promises on the Internet and TV ads are seemingly endless.  Finding a good lawyer, however, is important.  How can you do it?

I wrote a HoglundLaw blog last year about how to choose a lawyer for your Social Security claim.  Clarity is in order.  A good Social Security lawyer can correctly answer these 6 questions below correctly.  Before you hire a lawyer, print this out and ask these questions.  Can your potential Social Security Disability lawyer pass this test?

  1. Ask:  “Are you a licensed attorney?”  If you want representation from a lawyer who has gone to law school and can practice law, this will cut to the chase.  This is a yes or no question.
  2. Ask:  “How many hearings do you average a week?”  For most lawyers, an average of 2 or more Social Security hearings per week says a lot about their current experience and client base.
  3. Ask:  “Do you ever get into arguments with Social Security staff or judges?”  If your prospective lawyer brags about “scuffles” with Social Security, decide if he or she burns bridges.  If you smell smoke, get out!  You don’t want to be lugging around your lawyer’s baggage.  You want a persuasive lawyer.  Leave attack dogs at home.
  4. Ask:  “What do you argue other than medical evidence at Social Security hearings?”  Listen to the answer.  A good Social Security lawyer can explain how he or she will make you a real person for the judge at your hearing, not just a list of diagnoses.
  5. Ask:  “What is your win rate?”  This is a trick question.  Bad lawyers brag and induce you to hire them with a “success” rate.  Legal promises like this are unethical.  And there is another problem.  How do you think a lawyer gets a high win rate?  Cherry-picking.  Do you want to get dumped before your hearing to preserve the win rate?  A good lawyer, on the other hand, will candidly evaluate your case but not promise your result.  You want a lawyer who will stay the course.
  6. (I saved the best question for last.)  Ask:  “What do other local Social Security lawyers think about you?”  Then ask, “Can I call one that doesn’t work with you?”  A good lawyer will smile and hand you a card with a local name and a phone number.  A bad lawyer will try to explain his or her reputation.  If you might be talking with a bad lawyer, you might want to hire the new one on the card.  Good lawyers invite you to compare.

Find a good Social Security Disability lawyer.  If you have questions for our lawyers, call Hoglund Law Offices for a free consultation.

Andrew Kinney, Esq.

Attorney Andrew Kinney
Hoglund Lawyer Andrew Kinney

About the Author:  Attorney Andrew Kinney began practicing in the area of Social Security Disability Law in 1992.  He works at Hoglund Law Offices, a multi-state law firm listed in the top 100 largest law firms in Minnesota in 2010 by Lawyers Weekly.  He speaks locally and nationally, most recently on vocational expert cross-examination at a national conference in San Antonio.  He is currently a Chair of the Social Security Disability Law Section of the Minnesota State Bar Association.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


HOGLUND LAW CLIENT GETS SOCIAL SECURITY HEARING – WITH OBAMA’S HELP

Obama Speaks to Hoglund Law Client

Roseville, MN – After working and paying into Social Security for more than 30 years, Lois Dare had a curious cough.  Was it pneumonia?  She got a chest x-ray.  Later that day, her doctor’s office called her at home.  “You need to come in.”  The diagnosis?  Life-threatening lung cancer.  Parts of her left lung had to be removed.

Profoundly grateful to her doctors, her family, and her pastor to have survived her invasive surgery, she now needs oxygen to get through the day and night.  Without a job, and facing two denials for Social Security disability benefits, most people in this situation would feel sick and helpless.  Not Lois.

Her story to get her Social Security hearing would span the world from her town in Minnesota all the way to China.  In an era of disconnected politicians and short attention spans, she would gain the heart and the attention of the Minnesota Governor, the offices of the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Senate, and the President of the United States.

What is it about this remarkable woman that she can get so much done with so little energy?  To describe Lois, “empowered” is an understatement.  She’s very engaging, but had no political connections.  “Persistent” is inadequate, because she’s been chronically tired.  “Opportunistic”?  She’s had few opportunities since getting sick.  “Focused”?  Yes.  For Lois, the cancer bypassed her most generous organ:  Her heart.  And where her heart is, she goes.

Lois was at her girlfriend’s house a few weeks ago when she heard President Obama was coming through Minnesota to Cannon Falls on August 15, a few days later.  “I’ve got to talk to him,” Lois told her.  Impossible, thought her girlfriend.  Not for Lois.

She got back to her house.  “Fill up the gas tank,” she told her husband.

“What about your oxygen?” he worried.

“Just pack the batteries!”

So began the odyssey to talk with the President of the United States.

She lived out of her car for two days.  She stood in line for 11½ hours for tickets to hear the President speak.  She underwent security checks.  After satisfying all the initial requirements, Lois was one of 122 ticket holders who could hear the President speak close up.  But there was a problem.  More security checks were two football fields away.  She couldn’t make it with her oxygen in tow.  Was this the end of her chance to talk with the President of the United States?  Not for Lois.

She saw a car drive up.  She went over and leaned in toward the window.  “Could I have a ride?  I can’t make this walk and I want to see the President.”

“Get in,” said a friendly voice inside.  This is how Lois hitch-hiked a ride to meet the President of the United States.  Once at the new Secret Service check-points, the driver flashed a card and brought her through them.  She learned she was riding with the President’s press secretary.  “I wish I had a daughter,” she told him.  “If I did, I would have her meet a nice man like you.”  He laughed, hard.

Once out of the car, she secured a place right in front of the President’s dais.

After his speech, the President took a few questions from the audience.  Lois raised her hand, but couldn’t raise it too high.  He still called on her.

Lois asked the President what people are supposed to do when they are sick while waiting for Social Security benefits.  Lois was speaking for herself, but also for others like her.

The President answered her, agreeing with Lois that those who have become unable to work should be able to rely on Social Security benefits, especially since they have paid for them throughout their lifetime.

After leaving the podium, President Obama hugged Lois.  Close up, he told her she reminded him of his mother, who died of cancer.  “Whatever else he said to me, I don’t know.”  She was overwhelmed.

President Obama instructed his staff to get her contact information.  Then came the deluge.  Lois soon received calls from the offices of Rep. Michele Bachmann, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, and Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton.  The Associated Press called.  Even a Chinese correspondent wanted to interview her, without a translator.

She got her Social Security disability hearing scheduled in September.  Then Lois and I went to argue her claim.

 

Social Security disability hearings take time for Social Security to schedule, and the backlog of pending claims is increasing across the country.  Some states encourage programs that can clog the system with applications.  At the hearing level, attorneys can write legal briefs for an approval without a hearing.  In Lois’ case, however, her attorneys tried an “on-the-record” request for approval.

“Not all cases, despite your best efforts, can avoid a hearing,” says Tracy Bishop, a Hoglund attorney involved in Lois’ case.  “Sometimes the hearing is necessary to make the process human.”

Lois’ story is about gratitude.  Lois wants no one to take health for granted.  “I’m grateful to be alive, to be here on this Earth…I would rather have the aches and pains than to not be on this Earth.”

Lois’ story is about survival.  She will continue following up with her cancer doctor.

Lois’ story is also about resilience that rejects dependence.  “I needed somebody to hear me.  I did what I had to do.”  The message she lives is simple and profound:  When all seems lost, help yourself by reaching out to others.

 

For a video clip on the President’s appearance with Lois, click here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOZji2w-i30

Andrew Kinney, Esq.

9/28/11

HoglundLaw.com

akinney@hoglundlaw.com

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Is the Social Security Disability Program Facing Insolvency?

Is the Social Security Disability Program Facing Insolvency?

Over the past few years, Social Security’s disability program has seen an increase in applications, largely due to the loss of almost 7 million jobs in the economy. Applications for Social Security generally increase when the economy is bad, because many disabled people lose their jobs and are unable to find work. In 2011, Social Security is expecting 3.3 million applicants for disability benefits. The number of applications has increased 50% in the last ten years. The increased number of applicants has added to Social Security’s backlog of cases, and many applicants wait at least two years before their case is decided.

New estimates predict that the Social Security disability trust fund will be depleted by 2017. This means the disability program will not be able to pay beneficiaries their full benefits in 2017, unless Congress takes action. Social Security trustees are recommending that Congress reallocate money from the Social Security retirement program to the disability program. However, diverting money from the retirement program would only be a short-term solution and would hurt the retirement program.

Congress will likely have to make improvements to the Social Security disability program. Lawmakers are particularly concerned about overpayments. In 2010, Social Security disability beneficiaries received $1.4 billion in overpayments. Most of these payments went to people who started working and should not have qualified for the payments. Under the debt reduction plan that became law in early August, Congress can increase Social Security’s budget by $4 billion over the next ten years. The increased budget will provide resources for Social Security to identify beneficiaries who no longer qualify for benefits. Congress is also concerned about the lengthy application process for legitimately disabled applicants.

Source:

Stephen Ohlemacher, Social Security Disability on Verge of Insolvency, https://m.apnews.mobi/ap/db_6776/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=pDMRHiaX (accessed August 23, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Past Relevant Work


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability Law.  Today I wanted to talk about past relevant work.

It’s a phrase that Social Security uses a lot. It means the work you used to do within the last 15 years.  Why is past relevant work important to your case?  Well, when social security makes decisions about disability insurance and supplemental security income they go through a process.  They decide first if someone is currently working, it’s called SJ issues.  Then they look to what medical problems affect work in a basic way.  It’s called a severities step. The third step is deciding if the individual meets or equals any sort of definition or listing of disability.  The fourth step finally is can you return to you past relevant work; what you used to do?  And they have definitions of what you used to do exactly as opposed to what you used to do in the general category.  There is another step after that as to your ability to perform other work.  But in terms of performing past relevant work social security evaluates your past relevant work in every single case.

Now the essence of past relevant work is you probably know you can’t return to your past work if you’re applying for benefits, the medical standard is can you work full time at either your past work or other work.  That generally applies to most people depending on age.  So practically speaking, most people who are considering disability or have applied for social security disability benefits don’t think they can return to their past relevant work.

Now here’s the crux of the problem. Social Security, at least when you’re under 50, now will consider if you can return to not just what you used to do perhaps a specialist in something, skilled craftsman, maybe a lawyer. Social security will look not to whether you can return to that job let’s say you had a stroke and can’t concentrate too well they’ll consider that people under 50 whether they can return to other work as well.  So you can benefit greatly from having some legal advice as to whether you should apply or if you have applied how do I meet my definition of disability because if the only thing you can’t do is your past work you can probably perform some other part time work in some other capacity.   Your attorney is going to need to make arguments that you are by definition disabled.  You are by definition disabled if you meet certain criteria.  And again I’ll mention stroke but it can be any matter of health problems.  A lot of the health problems are listed under our disability library at www.HoglundLaw.com

The other instance where past relevant work actually is very important though is if you are over 50 or within 6 months of age 50.  And this can happen after you apply or can happen after you have your pending appeal.  In that case social security looks to see if you have physical restrictions first.  If physically you’re limited to sit down work or sedentary work.  And the definition of sedentary is within social security’s regulations.  As absorbed to the dictionary of occupational title.  Social Security looks to see if you can’t return to your past work and you’re limited to sit down work, if you’re over 50, and you don’t have skills that could shift into other sort of sedentary work you can be what’s called gridded out.  There are some guidelines that social security uses for people over 50 and that’s again an instance where past relevant work is crucial.

If you have questions about past relevant work please feel free, if you don’t already have an attorney call our office at 1-800-850-7867 you can also go on our website at www.HoglundLaw.com.  Hopefully this information can help you.  If we can actually represent you that’s wonderful.  But keep in mind that these concepts are specific to Social Security so getting to know them is very important.  Thank you.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Submitting Evidence After Social Security Hearing


Video Transcription:

Hi my name is Andrew Kinney and I’m a Social Security attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  Today I wanted to talk about submitting evidence after your social security hearing.

Social security has hearings for people who are applying for disability insurance and supplemental security income.  First, there is an application, in most cases a reconsideration stage, and then a hearing.  The hearing is with a federal administrative law judge that looks at your medical records and decides your case based on that your testimony and other factors.

The subject today is unique because most times you should get your medical evidence in before your social security hearing, not after.  But sometimes you don’t have a choice.  Usually, what I see if we get involved in a social security claim and someone is unrepresented is that all the evidence was not to the judge on time.  Usually, when that happens we’re helping at the level after the appeals counsel level.  So we’re submitting evidence that should have been available before the hearing way too late, I would argue.  In social security claims its important all along the way to make sure social security has all the updated medical records at all the stages I talked about.  But what is particularly important, at least by when  your hearing is scheduled, is that you do a final push and get all the updated records from all the medical sources so that they’re available at the hearing.

In the situation at hand here, when I’m talking about submitting records after the hearing, one of challenges is that at some point after the hearing the judge will have a written decision.  The date of that written decision will be the last day the judge will look at this stuff for now.  You have an unknown deadline after a hearing to submit medical evidence.  What do you do about it?  Well, if you have an attorney with you at the hearing the attorney should ask to hold a record open. Typically, we ask the judge “Don’t make a decision your honor until we can get these specific records.”  Generally, judges have a deadline for that.  Now if you don’t have that agreement then you really don’t know if you’ll have time to get updated medical evidence.  So a backup option, particularly if you’re unrepresented is to call your hearing office after the hearing and talk to the assistant to the judge and ask can the judge not make a decision because there was some evidence that I forgot.

The basic idea here is you can get evidence in after a hearing at least according to the current law, but it’s not ideal in fact by any stretch of the imagination. You should at all cost try to get evidence in before.   If you do submit records after your hearing your attorney should submit a brief if at all possible explaining why these record are relevant in fact. Also it should be explained why they’re relevant and that the judge should look at them when the judge may have made a decision in the case but has not committed it to writing.  If you have more questions about Social Security benefits, applying for social security, or in the case of here, how should I handle my evidence in my social security claim well be happy to talk with you.  You can call 1-800-850-7867.  You can also go online at www.HoglundLaw.com and look up these sorts of issues.  Hopefully this helped today.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Over 50? Why Age Matters In A Social Security Disability Claim?


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability Law.  Today I wanted to talk about why age matters in social security claims.

We help many, many people.  Some are younger some are older.  Social Security Law treats older people differently, specifically people over 50.  Why does that matter?  Well the standards change at age 50.  Some people call it a grid, but Social Security calls it a medical vocational guideline.  What does that mean?  When you’re trying to prove you’re unable to work, you are left confronting the social security process. It’s very, very important to know what the standards are.

What would allow you to be approved?  If you’re over 50 and you have physical problems that require you to sit-down or do sedentary work, that may allow you an automatic approval with certain criteria met.  If you can’t return to your past relevant work, or what you used to do the last 15 years, there’s another video on past relevant work specifically.  So if you’re under 50  you maybe approved for Social Security benefits. But, if you’re over 50 or will soon be over 50 you could take advantage of the easier guidelines to be approved.

Now you don’t have to be limited to sedentary work only if you’re over 55 you might be limited to light level work, and social security has definitions of what light means, but you’re limited to certain physical kinds of work and you can’t return to your past work you might be able to be approved to social security easier. So, it’s good to know how your age matters.

If you have more questions about Social Security law, grids in particular feel free to go to our website at www.HoglundLaw.com.  You can also call us at 1-800-850-7867 if you think you might want to have a lawyer help you.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Top 5 Things To Know About Your SS Hearing


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I practice Social Security Law at Hoglund Law offices.  Today I wanted to talk about the 5 top things you need to know about your Social Security hearing.

Number one:  Why do you have a Social Security hearing?  Well at the Social Security process you have an application, reconsideration, and then you get to a hearing.  The hearing is different than the prior 2 stages because at the hearing you get to talk to the decision maker.  Who is the decision maker?  A judge.  You talk directly to a judge about your medical problems. The hearing itself can be an informal process. It’s a private conference room in which you can explain your situation and your day-to-day limits to someone.

The next thing you know: Two.  Who is at the hearing?  There’s the judge that I mentioned, you’re certainly there, it would be good to have an attorney there to cross-examine the experts.  There’s always, almost always I should say, a vocational expert.  Sometimes there is a medical expert either a psychologist or a medical doctor.  And finally there is a hearing monitor.  That hearing monitor makes sure a hearing goes smoothly.  There can be your family members sitting in back.  Keep in mind that I’m giving general ideas.

The third thing you need to know about your social security hearing is what happens at it? As I mentioned you’re giving testimony at the hearing.  You’re talking to the judge under oath about why you can’t work and specifically how you’re limited.  The medical records tell the judge what’s wrong with you. But, you’re saying well here’s how much I can lift, here’s how much I can carry, here’s how much I can walk, here’s how my depression affects my daily life, here’s how many anxiety attacks I have per month, or per week. There are many reasons people can’t work. The medical reasons involve functional limitations.  Keep in mind these is a video on what’s called an RFC about that topic.

The fourth thing you need to know about your hearing, how long is it?  Well that’s easy.  Generally hearings are between a half hour and an hour.  Now, that can vary as well.  In the hearing there is at least one expert, the vocational expert. The judge will ask you questions, then your attorney will ask you questions. Then the judge turns to at least the vocational expert ask questions and your attorney follows up with that as well.  The attorney should give a closing argument.  Hearings last about an hour, but different judges have different styles, and these judges are federal judges and whatever style they have its their hearing.  Just make sure you ask your attorney what’s this judge like?  An experienced attorney will let you know if they ask questions and maybe you need to ask what they mean again.  What’s important is that there is a personality to each of these judges and what’s important for your attorney to do is explain what the judge is like so it helps you have fewer questions at the hearing.

Finally, the fifth thing that you need to know about your hearing is when you get a decision.  I get this question a lot, usually before the hearing.  Sometimes it’s the cart before the horse because you need to get the hearing done first but it’s good to know what happens next.  Generally decisions are made between 2 and 4 months after the decision is in writing but there are exceptions to that, some judges use what’s called bench decisions. That would mean that you would get a decision from the judge, on the record at the hearing. Generally those are always favorable decisions.  But, ultimately you get a decision in writing after the hearing.  And if you have an expectation you can always be surprised if these is a decision that comes sooner.

Hopefully these 5 things you need to know about your Social Security hearing was helpful.  If you have more information about what to expect at a Social Security hearing, I happen to write a guide called a client’s guide to Social Security hearings.  You can just look at the search with those as search terms.  Look under client guide to social security hearings and hopefully you see the Hoglund law guide that shows a step-by-step more detailed than this video.

If you have more questions about just wanting help with your Social Security claim, about applying or appealing were happy to talk with you, you can call us at 1-800-850-7867, the number on our screen.  If there is any way we can help you we want to.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


5 Reasons To Get An Attorney – Handling your own Social Security Case


Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability Law.  I also help people with supplemental security income, otherwise known as SSI.  Today I wanted to talk about why it may not be in your best interest to handle your own social security case.

Well, I have 5 reasons.  First, when you apply, it’s very important is that your application is complete.  You can apply online or in person or you can apply over the phone.  What you don’t know though is, is everything in?  Do they have all the information they need?  And ultimately, did I choose the right date when I said I first couldn’t work?  That isn’t always obvious.

The second reason why you may not want to handle your want social security case is that you have to appeal at every step within a certain deadline.  So you have an application stage, a reconsideration stage, a hearing stage, and what’s called the appeals counsel after the hearing stage.  There are deadlines between each of those stages, and if you miss those deadlines you perhaps could have good cause. But, generally you cannot expect to do anything but start over if you miss appeals.

A third reason why not to handle your own social security case is that during the process you can get input from doctors beyond medical records.  What form of input would help?  What do doctors need to comment on?  How can doctors comment on it?  Who gets it if you get a letter form a doctor?  Are there better forms or charts that would otherwise be available?  These are issues that a lawyer can help you with.

A fourth reason to perhaps why not handle your social security case on your own is one of the two most important reasons.  The fourth reason is that you’re at a hearing.  The judge is a federal judge, you’re in a private conference room, with a tape running.  You’ve given a testimony, the judge is a trained lawyer, there is generally always a job expert in there trained in social security law, wondering whether you can do work, there may even be a medical expert in there talking about your own medical records and wondering whether the standards that disability has are met.  So if you think about it, you’re in a hearing and you have to give your own testimony about why you don’t feel well, why you’re disabled, why you haven’t returned to work and what work you worked for.  You have to be ready to cross examine these experts.  So keep in mind that if you want this kind of help, if you want a trained attorney that does hearings all the time, it’s easy enough within reason to try to hire someone late in the game.  But don’t wait any later if you decide you need a lawyer.

The fifth reason and I would think the biggest reason that you should perhaps consider not handling your own social security case is that you don’t feel well.  If you have a medical problem particularly a psychological problem or maybe chronic pain that affects your ability to concentrate, handling your own social security case alone is very, very difficult enough, let alone not feeling well.  So, if you keep that in mind, knowing that you don’t feel well, feel free to call our offices at www.HoglundLaw.com.  You can also call us at 1-800-850-7867.  Thank you.”

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Adaptative Functioning


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability.  Today I’m going to talk a little more about cases involving borderline intellectual functioning.

I have a previous video that discusses the basics of how social security uses definitions of disability to defining impairments with IQ scores.  What I’m going to talk about now is more specific, adaptive functioning.  Adaptive functioning is claimants have been able to survive and actually thrive in a work environment.  That’s a good thing, but that doesn’t always happen.  So if you are pursuing social security benefits on borderline intellectual functioning, or social security calls it mental retardation under listing 1205 C, It is very important for your attorney to know that we have evidence of adaptive functioning.

functioning, because if an individual has shown, despite the work history, they only worked alongside family members or close friends with understanding bosses, they may not have adapted properly. So in those situations, if someone has not adapted then that would be evidence of it, and so I would perhaps have a family member testify at the hearing, that they helped them get the job, they showed up at the job during lunch, they had interactions with the boss.

It comes down to this:  Sometimes jobs that people do look like they’ve adapted and can function well, and that’s a good thing, but sometimes the actual job the way its performed is more toward sheltered workshops or sheltered work.  That sort of work is done with direct supervision and its different than competitive work.

There are other examples of where adaptive functioning comes into play.  For instance, if they went back to school and learned a specific skill or not.  There are also questions about day-to-day activities.  Reading the paper, basic functions, taking the bus.  There are a lot of other examples about what adaptive functioning actually is and it’s important at hearings to get evidence of it.  If you have further questions about adaptive functioning, borderline intellectual functioning in general, or just about getting benefits for social security disability please feel free to call our offices at 1-800-850-7867.  You can also go to www.HoglundLaw.com.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Dismissal of a claim – Administrative Law Judge – Social Security ALJ


Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I am an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice social security disability law.  Today I wanted to talk about dismissal of hearings by Administrative Law Judges, otherwise known as ALJ’s.

When you apply for social security disability, there could be a big difference from the time you apply to the time of your hearing.  Sometimes as much as 2 years or more depending on the area you live. By the time you get to your hearing you would have gotten a letter roughly 3 weeks in advance stating the time and location of your hearing.  Well, people often relocate and can even lose contact with the attorney that’s helping them with their social security claim.  So, sometimes we have dismissals of hearings by the SSA when someone doesn’t show up for their hearing.

Now I wanted to distinguish dismissals from withdrawals from hearings.  Withdrawals would mean if someone is helping you with your social security claim and you decide that it’s in your best interest to not pursue the hearing, for instance if there’s not enough evidence and the attorney has given you good legal judgment on that.  Sometimes you withdraw your hearing request and you re-file and start over and the last denial is the reconsideration denial.  This is different. If you have a dismissal. That means that you didn’t show and there was no explanation why you didn’t show.  If you have an attorney, you technically have a right to protect your right to a hearing by having the attorney show on your behalf, but at some point for you to get a proper hearing, it will be important to be able to appear at your hearing because there would be at least a rescheduling of one hearing.

So, if you have a dismissal of a hearing and you’re wondering what to do, the first thing you should do is call the hearing office.  Also, call your attorney, if you have one, and find out what to do.  Now there are some factors that are hard to quantify. For instance, if it’s over a year that you’ve missed your hearing and you’re first learning about it I have not had any experience where someone has been able to get a new hearing.  But, if it’s within a certain amount of time since you’ve had your hearing and you’ve missed it, what’s very important is that you have an opportunity to offer what’s called the cause.  Here’s why I missed my hearing, here’s my circumstances, it could be family emergency, it could be homelessness, it could be many factors.  But, what the judges need to allow a new hearing and avoid a dismissal is a good reason to miss your first hearing.  If you have an attorney that’s helping you, they will get involved.

Last winter we had examples of the snow being too bad to be able to get in to a hearing.  Or, an inordinate amount of traffic.  If there are some more practical reasons you couldn’t make it on time to your hearing those may have a better chance of getting a hearing rescheduled.  So if you have a hearing dismissal letter or at least the threat for it, make sure to respond right away.  If you find that it’s too late and you lost your right to a hearing, what you can do is re-file a new case, get an attorney, and help them re-open the prior case.

So, that can take a lot of time. But, it is the best thing you can do to make up for what would be lost back pay.  If you have more questions about dismissals from administrative law judges, or just general questions about social security disability feel free to call our office at 1-800-850-7867.  You can also visit www.HoglundLaw.comWe also have other videos about different subjects to help you.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Disabiltity Listed Impairments Information


Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability law.  Today I wanted to talk about listed impairments.

What does that mean?  Well in the world of social security law, social security takes any medical reason that you might be unable to work full-time and they define it.  There are certain levels of problems you can have either physically or emotionally that if they’re bad enough with enough measured criteria, you could be by definition disabled, so listings are essentially definitions of disability.  On our website at www.HoglundLaw.com we go through some of those definitions of disability and you can also find those on the ssa.gov website as well.

What does it matter that you have a listed impairment?  If you may have a listed impairment then you want to make sure that your doctor has perhaps documented this well or even written a letter laying out why it meets the definition of disability.  That could really make or break a case.  Otherwise if someone is not by definition disabled under the listings, you have to prove you are unable to perform past relevant work. We have a video on past relevant work.  So if you understand what a listed impairment is or a listing you can understand that its social security’s way of saying that you get a pass, you’re approved.

There are two ways you can meet the definition or at least be approved under a listing.  One is called meeting a listing.  All the elements of a listing laid out by the law are all in your medical record.  An alternative way that you can do that is what’s called equaling a listing.  If you’re at a hearing and there’s a medical expert testifying whether you meet or equal a listing that’s what that means, and ive even recently done this, you can argue why doesn’t my client equal a listing?  Equaling means that you don’t meet all the criteria but you meet most of it.  That’s very important, and allows a little fudge room.  If you have more questions about listings or more questions about help an attorney help you with ym case, feel free to go to our website at www.HoglundLaw.com.  You can also call us a 1-800-850-7867.  Thank you.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Testimony Of a Medical Expert In a Disability Claim


Video Transcription:

“Hi my name is Andrew Kinney.  I work at Hoglund Law offices.  I’m an attorney there and I practice Social Security Disability law.  Today I wanted to talk about medical expert testimony at social security hearings.

Social Security has an application process.  From application to reconsideration, and ultimately you need to get denied at those two stages to get to a social security hearing with a federal social security administrative law judge.  When you get to that level the government can opt to have a medical expert testify, get paid by the government, and appear at the hearing.  The testimony may or may not be favorable to you but they are entitled to be in the hearing room while you’re giving testimony and then you can hear what they’re testifying about

Now the question is this: If you’re unsure about hiring an attorney at the lower stages that could be understandable, but at least consider thinking about hiring a social security attorney.  Consider that a hearing itself has a federal judge who is an attorney and it generally always has a vocational expert in the hearing. But you may also find that there’s a medical expert at the hearing.  They would never have met you in person, they would only have viewed your medical records and they will give an opinion on you’re being disabled or not based on just the medical records and at times some of your testimony.

So consider this.  There is medical expert testimony at hearings.  If you have a chance you would want to cross examine that doctor if you disagree with that doctor.  Some people can go to hearings on their own.  That cross examination will be up to you.  I would argue that, at least consider that it would be better to have someone trained that does cross examination of experts on almost every business day.

At Hoglund Law offices were well equipped to help you with not only developing your case and getting approvals perhaps before a hearing, but if you do go to a hearing we sit right with you and we listen to the medical expert testimony when that happens and we cross examine those medical experts about the objective evidence in your medical file.  So, if you want some “piece of mind” just know that if you hire an attorney, perhaps our office or some other office, we will make sure you have an “insurance policy” against a testimony that just doesn’t make sense.

So it important for you to know if you have questions about social security benefits, what hearings are all about we’ve spent some time on our website about hearings in particular.  Feel free to check out our disability library and blogs.  Feel free to check out www.HoglundLaw.com.  You can also call our office at 1-800-850-7867.  Hopefully this video helps and please feel free to make use of all the other materials available to help you.  Thank you.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Developing Medical Evidence In A Social Security Disability Claim


Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney practicing law at Hoglund Law offices.  I also practice Social Security Disability Law.  Today I wanted to talk about developing medical evidence for your social security claim.

One of the most common questions people think about when applying for social security is “How can I get approved?”.  Well, the most important thing we tell our clients is you need to regularly treat with your doctors and specialists if necessary.  Why?  Because social security is primarily looking at the medical evidence form you’re treating doctors to make a decision on whether you’re unable to work full-time and it will be expected to last a year.  So, if you think about it, you can write all the forms you want about your particular problems and that is necessary for social security applications and for the later forms that you’ll get, but what’s more important is that you have a relationship with your doctor where your doctor knows what’s wrong and has diagnosed you properly.

So, developing medical evidence in a file is crucial. So, when social security needs to know where records are at the first 3 stages the application, and reconsideration stage, it’s important that you lay out everywhere you’ve had treatment that’s relevant.  Now, as you approach hearing, the third stage of a social security claim, that’s very important that there’s an update from the hearing request all the way through to the hearing day.  That is what your attorney can help a lot with.  Now it’s always important to get all the evidence from your treating doctor that’s given.  What else can you get aside form specific medical evidence from treating doctors that will help you?  Well, that’s where creative evidence comes into play.

There are times when an attorney can get evidence that isn’t from your treating doctor for treatment but is related to your medical condition.  For example, if there’s a VA claim where you’re getting VA benefits, there’s a decision that supports that.  We can get those.  There are other times that you might have a child support hearing where you’re proving you can’t work and your doctor may have signed off on some statement for that.  We can get those.  A lot of people have workers comp claims.  We get that information from those.  Some people have personal injury claims and on and on.  There are records that exist beyond your normal medical records and even records that exist that aren’t even medical records that are important to help your case before and after your hearing.

So an example would be if you keep a journal of seizures. Other people could also write down how often you have seizures if you lose consciousness.   That’s a classic example of a journal that can help your doctor certainly, but it can also be used, and we would submit evidence of that, because otherwise you can necessarily testify about that at a hearing because you may be unaware of the situations.

The idea is, is that there are no holds barred to what you can’t offer in evidence.  What it comes down to is good legal judgment as to what would help the judge make a decision, what would help the judge make a decision and what would essentially be non-essential or irrelevant.  There are also situations after hearings where you can get further evidence.  Until the hearing decision comes in there are times when we might need to fill a gap or a hole that appears based on what happens at the hearing.  In those situations you can get a medical opinion specific to that problem.  We can also get evidence after a hearing if there is new evidence that just comes in or if you forgot about evidence and remembered it.  If there’s ever a time that you forgot about evidence, maybe a visit to a neurologist, a one-time visit. It’s always important to let your attorney know before a hearing, during a hearing, or even after a hearing because what we try to do is get the evidence in at some point in time ideally before the hearing, but in some point in time to allow the judge to consider that in your case.

If you have more questions about how to develop medical evidence and how important legal judgment is in that.  You can also refer to a recent blog on www.HoglundLaw.com that I wrote on that subject.  You can also call our number if you have questions about social security generally at 1-800-850-7867.  Thank you.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Auxiliary Benefits; In other words, benefits for your dependents


Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney. I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices. I practice Social Security Disability Law. Today I wanted to talk about auxiliary benefits. Auxiliary Benefits means, benefits that your dependents get if you’re on disability insurance.
Many of our clients work hard for a long time and then their unable to work. If we can prove that they are unable to work, they get back pay and ongoing benefits through the disability insurance program. An individual getting disability insurance gets a set amount based on the work history and the cost of living adjustments annually.
Now there’s another kind of benefit if an individual like that, one of our clients, has one or more dependent children, and that would be children living in their household, and under 18 is a general rule. If they have one or more children in that status they can get an extra amount sent to them on behalf of the children each month, and also for the timeframe of back pay. Those are the auxiliary benefits. Auxiliary benefits are a formula based on the amount an individual gets for disability insurance and there are no auxiliary benefits supplemental security income. SSI or supplemental security income is purely a need based program. So if you’re getting disability insurance and you have one or more children under 18 at home, you can plan to get more per month. Social Security can lay out how much to expect and your attorney will know at the hearing level, generally, what you might get in addition to your primary insurance amount, what you get per month.
Now, Social Security evaluates disability insurance based on your own benefits. They’ll go through not only the favored decision but they’ll also have what’s called an award letter. That will follow that up and explain what your benefits will be. If you have dependent children, you will get eventually a call from Social Security after they have figured out your insurance amount and at that point they’ll process the fact that you have one or more children at home, and verify where they live. If someone is approved for disability insurance benefits they get their decision that’s favorable, they get their award letter that describes their back pay, at that point, within a short period of time social security should contact them because they might have more children with them. They’ll verify the children are with them and not with perhaps an ex-spouse, and if the children are with them let’s say it’s$100 a month that’s added to the base amount that you get. There will be a $25 check for each of the children. The children essentially share a flat auxiliary benefit amount, and that can be complicated. If one of these four children were living with the mother for example there would be $75 for the three children at your household but there would be one $25 check sent to the other household where the other child is with the mother.

So, you can see that Social Security has some following up to do once you’re approved for benefits. Don’t assume that Social Security knows that you have children. When you apply you state the children that you have, their social security numbers and where they’re living but occasionally we see that that’s missed. Take it upon yourself with a favorable decision, once you get your award letter, to call social security or go to a local office and mention that you would like to begin the auxiliary benefits process.

If you have more questions about the auxiliary benefits process, or about social security disability benefits in general, please feel free to call us anytime at 1-800-850-7867. You can also go to our website at www.HoglundLaw.com We try to make sure that we have as much information as possible to help you.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Disability Benefits for Disabled Adult Children


Video Transcription:
“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney, I’m an attorney practicing law at Hoglund Law offices, and I practice Social Security Disability law in particular. Today I wanted to talk about benefits for disabled adult children.
What that means is that these benefits are based on a parents work history. That means that the parents are either deceased or retired and the child has been proven disabled under social security law before age 22. Examples of this are; if somebody had a traumatic brain injury at age 21 and from that point forward were unable to work and were disabled. The medical question was a given and the timing of the accident was before age 22, in that example, if a parent was disabled then the child could also get disability benefits based on the retired parents earnings record.

So disabled adult children cases are important because the standards are different. When you look at a disabled adult child, were looking at whether currently disabled, but were also looking at when the disability began. So that’s crucial in a disabled adult child case.

If you have more questions about disabled adult child cases or your own disability insurance benefits case or social security security disability in general, please feel free to call out offices at 1-800-850-7867. We also have done our best to make our website as helpful as possible and that’s www.HoglundLaw.com

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Long Term Disability and Social Security

Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney. I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law. I practice in the area of Social Security Disability law. Today I wanted to talk about Social Security benefits and long term disability.

Long term disability is private disability insurance usually paid by an employer. But, occasionally someone can get long term disability policy in the open market. It’s no different than health insurance, some people get it from the employer and then some also pay for health insurance on their own. So, long term disability is not associated with government. There are private insurance companies offering this. Long term disability coverage is good and if you have it, in my book, you are very lucky. The reason is this: If you have long term disability coverage and you get injured at work and you are unable to work, maybe something happened at work or something happened at home, you would be able to get some benefits to replace income when otherwise you would not have been working. How is it important to you?

If you’re in a position where you’re working and you have long term disability insurance offered through work, the first thing to find out if you have it. If you do have long term disability insurance when can you can apply for it. There may be times where there is short term disability and short term generally is 0-6 months after you’re disabled. Not all companies have both short term and long term disability. So it’s good to know what your benefits are as an employee.

If you are making the long term disability insurance claim through your employer or perhaps directly to the insurance company what’s very important is that there’s almost always Social Security offset clause in your long term disability contract. What I mean is the long term disability contract anticipated you apply for Social Security benefits and if approved, you will actually have to pay the long term disability carrier back for those months that you get paid both when social security looks back.

I’ll give you an example that would be helpful. I had a client yesterday that was getting long term disability insurance ad she had to go to a hearing and we eventually proved she was unable to work and she would get 2 years of back pay and those 2 years of back pay would actually go to the long term disability insurance carrier by their contract. And so in a way the long term disability carrier advanced the money on to what eventually became a social security claim.

So not to get to technical here, what is important for you to know? If you have a long term disability claim you will generally be contacted by that disability insurance company to get representation to apply for Social Security. In fact it’s generally mandatory that you do that to be able to get long term disability benefits.

Who can help you? Well, you can make your own choice as to who represents you in at least the last ten years I’ve seen a change in the long term disability industry. They used to allow attorneys to help clients get on Social Security Benefits, attorneys like myself. So over time there have been non-attorney processing firms that I’ve seen that have taken over and have gotten group contracts with long term disability carriers. So if you want an attorney to help you, you have a right to hire anyone you please if you have a long term disability claim and any money, a quarter of back pay, something that would go to the attorney, is not something that would go to the long term disability insurance carrier.

So hopefully if you have this situation this video helped but if you have more questions about long term disability and how it impacts social security disability claim you can call 1-800-850-7867 or you can feel free to get information on our website that’s right below. www.HoglundLaw.com

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Date Last Insured (DLI)


Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney. I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices, and I practice Social Security Disability Law. Today I wanted to talk about DLI, or date last insured.

Sometimes, the clients that we help have good questions about what the date last insured is. It is extremely important to Social Security Disability cases. So first I’ll start with what is DLI or date last insured. When people work at a job for a number of years, they’re not only getting their paycheck, but they are also paying into social security disability insurance system; the federal disability insurance program. When someone stops working, they stop paying in to the system. So eventually when someone stops paying their premiums they aren’t insured anymore. That is the date when they’re last insured for disability insurance benefits.

So if we are to look at this as an analogy, if someone is paying car payments and they pay every month and they stop making car payments eventually they are not insured if they get in a car accident. Same idea here; If you work and stop working roughly after 5 years after you stop regular work (It can vary) when you stop working, you eventually are not covered and you have to prove you are unable to work on or before that date last insured.

So that’s what date last insured is. It comes from your earnings record and how many quarters of coverage you earn (up to four per year). It gets kind of technical but it’s automatically figured out for your social security claim. It’s very important for an attorney, and I’ll explain now how it applies to you. With a Social Security disability claim, one of the first things our attorneys look at is your date last insured.

Sometimes, it’s in the future and sometimes it’s not. If it’s in the future it’s not an issue, if it’s in the past it’s a horrific issue. Then we would look in your case to see if the condition was disabling under the law, on or before that date. Let’s say that someone stopped working before 2005 and their date last insured was December 31 of 2010 luckily 5 years later. Let’s say they get in a car accident January 1st of the following year. If someone is disabled by that car accident, you’re not insured because you weren’t disabled before your date last insured. So the basic idea is when you have a social security disability claim, the date last insured is very important.

So if you have questions about your case or specific questions specifically about your date last insured feel free to call our offices at 1-800-850-7867. You can also find information at our website that you can see below. www.HoglundLaw.com

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Disability Attorney Fees


Video Transcription:
“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices and I practice Social Security Disability law.

What I’m going to talk about now is attorney fees, something that can be scary for some people.  What people expect when they hire an attorney is that they would have to pay attorney money up front and then also expect to pay by the hour, and that’s understandable because that is how a lot of attorneys work.

Social Security Disability law is different.  One of the things we can do is charge a quarter of back pay only if you’re approved, and then send it to us.  So the essential idea for you is, at least with us, there is no money up front if someone would hire us to help with a Social Security Disability application.

There are some attorneys that also charge out of pocket expenses.  If someone has an out of pocket expense they may be doing that to offset the cost that medical records and things that from state to state can cause some upfront costs.  We do not charge that.  So if you are investigating an attorney whoever you are, you could ask upfront are there any costs other than attorney fees and when do I need to pay them?

One of the elements of attorney fees is that there are some non-attorney firms that do this work.  If a non-attorney firm does this work then one of the most important things you could find out is their experience.  It’s also important to be clear if they’re licensed to practice law in that state.  But if they’re a non-attorney they too can get a quarter of back pay if you’re approved.  It’s very important though to know that if you think about it if someone is going to turn a quarter of back pay, who do you want helping you?  And that choice as to who you trust to help you prove the disability claim which could result in perhaps many years of benefits. It’s important to get someone good.

One good way of finding out someone that’s good is to talk to an attorney that you may know in the field and get some people that have experience with an attorney.  So as far as attorney fees go I wanted to mention one more thing.  Attorneys are not allowed under current Social Security regulations from charging any outside fees; they cannot charge you hours beyond the allowable amount.  In other words you won’t pay a quarter for attorney fees and then find out you have some other bill.

There are rare situations where if someone has an attorney and the attorney charges hours.  You need to be upfront with an attorney and say I only want, or at least this is what I would recommend, to pay a quarter of back pay and nothing else.  There are some law firms that hold the right to also petition for fees if they don’t get any back pay and you can in a hole depending on your situation.  If you’re reviewing a contingency fee agreement that allows a quarter of back pay to be paid, be very careful in looking at it because that’s a legal document.  If there’s anything about being able to charge per hour that’s built in if there are not enough fees to satisfactory to the attorney, you may wish to question that and wish for that to be crossed out.

Hopefully this information helps.  If you have more questions about attorney fees please feel free to call our offices if you wish at 1-800-850-7867.  You can also look at our website that’s below.  Hopefully that has some useful information for you.  Thank you.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Homelessness through the Social Security Application process


Video Transcription:
“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney. I’m an attorney practicing Social Security Disability Law and Supplemental Security Income law at Hoglund Law offices. Today in this video I wanted to explain a broad topic, a very difficult topic, but one that requires discussion.

Today I wanted to talk about how you handle homelessness through application process. Homelessness is an issue that essentially, for whatever reason, makes someone hard to get a hold of. We have a lot of clients, at least a fair number of clients, who have difficulty (for obvious reasons) being able to maintain a residence or finding somewhere else to stay. One of the elements of homelessness that I’m addressing here is if there’s mental illness or physical illness that’s caused homelessness .

What’s very important if at all possible is to work with the county and particularity a case worker. Case workers can know where shelters are they can know where other places where someone can stay for a longer term.

So this video addresses not only is people that have difficulty maintaining where you live but also if you have a family member with this problem that might have a medical problem and needs to apply for social security or already has. Also this is for case workers in general.

So I would say this: It is very important to get an application in. For social security there is no spontaneous application that happens. If it’s very clear for instance that someone has paranoid schizophrenia it’s very clear that someone may need social security benefits, but until that application is submitted, social security won’t necessarily know where they are.

There have been some initiatives in the past to try to find out and seek out people that have difficulties with homelessness with mental illness or physical illness. But those initiatives you can’t rely on. What is very important, again, is if you know someone that needs help or if you need help medically make sure to treat with a doctor and make sure to get regular medical care. That’s easier said than done depending on the state you’re in. Using the example of schizophrenia or perhaps depression. If you don’t treat then there won’t be enough proof generally to prove that you have the disability. Social Security looks at medical records. If someone is homeless, understandably they have difficulty getting to doctor’s appointments, let alone even knowing when they are going to have their next food.

So cooperate with a case worker and make sure the case worker is helping coordinate where you are.  If you have our law office helping you it’s very important to give us contact information of where other family members are, even if they are out of state. It may be that they know where you are. The last thing that we want is a client who applied and we can’t find them, its basically heartbreaking. So make sure that there are multiple contact sources for you or for the person that you’re helping.

So with regular medical care and an attorney’s office doing appeals for you, even if we can’t find you we can do what’s called a protective appeal. It’s not ideal, but in the short span of time there is an appeal necessary we may go online and appeal for you just to keep your case going, and we will continue trying to reconnect with you if we’ve lost you. So if you know that you have a pending case going know that social security won’t necessarily know where you are. At minimum, if you are on your own make sure to go to local social security office and maybe get a status update on your case. Social Security may allow you to continue your case if you had been denied and didn’t know about it.

So there are a lot of legal issues here particularly involving notice of denials that come into play. So if you want help from a law firm that cares, and that’s Hoglund Law offices, feel free to call our office number at 1-800-850-7867. You can also find us at www.HoglundLaw.com So good luck and hopefully you get the benefits that you need to be able to survive.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Disability Case Law: Supplemental Security Income (SSI)


Video Transcription:
“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney. I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices. I practice Social Security Disability law and I practice supplemental security income law.

Today I wanted to talk about an important topic, Case law. What I mean by that is Federal Case law. The social security administration disability program follows federal case law. What I mean is it’s a federal program, and even though the state agency and social security ultimately at a hearing make decisions internally as an agency ultimately they have to follow federal court law. Federal courts have different circuits spread out across the country. They also have specific courts for specific areas. What I’m telling you is you have case law that may apply to your social security case. That’s why if you have a lawyer it important to ask if there’s any federal case law in my favor.

Now there are other laws, certainly, that take precedence. If there are regulations in your favor form social security itself those are most important. There are also rulings. Those are rules that the judges have to follow in a hearing. There are also POMS. Those are code words for how social security processes your case at lower levels. There are a lot of different things to track but ultimately case law is where the trends show. I meet with local attorneys and meet on a national level as well about case law and about things that apply to my clients here and may apply to my future clients.

If you have questions about whether you should have an attorney in your social security hearing or even helping you apply for benefits forward keep in mind that only an attorney is licensed to practice law and only an attorney can give legal advice, particularly about case law. Think again, too, that there are times that federal case law is cited in front of a federal judge at a hearing.

With these things in mind, if you’re unrepresented or perhaps are wondering about what sort of help you might need, know that the people that help you need to know this federal case law, whether an attorney or not. If you have more questions about social security benefits in general, hopefully we can help you. Feel free to call Hoglund law offices at 1-800-850-7867. You can also visit our website at www.HoglundLaw.com. Thank you.”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Disability Attorney Fee Petitions

Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney, I’m an attorney and I practice at Hoglund Law offices. I do Social Security Disability law for a living. Today I wanted to talk about Fee Petitions.

Most people that need an attorney when they apply for social security benefits, that’s one of the first questions that come up; How do I pay for the attorney? The traditional way that most attorneys in my field get paid is a quarter of back pay, only if you’re approved. So let’s say that you argue that you’re disabled, you get an attorney, you meet with a federal judge, and your approved, and you get a year of back pay, the attorney would automatically get a quarter of back pay to what’s called a contingency fee agreement. That contingency fee agreement has to be approved by the judge and there can be no payments unless the judge approves it on that line.

Now, there are times when someone changes the attorney they want or perhaps they have a non-attorney and they wanna hire an attorney when they decide what kind of background they want for the person representing them. If someone has a contingency fee agreement and you sign up with them and you change your mind which is absolutely within your right, and the new attorney comes on there cannot be two contingency fee agreements. That is usually the situation that fee petitions usually arise from. That’s usually when you see if neither attorneys were to withdraw their request for the 25% they are thrown out and you’ll see what’s called a fee petition.

A fee petition is where you can see an attorney for the fabled decision, or non-attorney, arguing that they put a certain number of hours in your case and they want payment, and it goes through the judge that handled your case and its approved that way. So, technically a fee petition is more like the attorney fees that attorneys are paid, but it’s just only if you’re approved.

So, here’s what you can look for: If you look at the attorney fee agreement, you can look to see if there is language that says if the attorney doesn’t get paid enough I want to petition for fees. If that’s written in there, you can ask to have that crossed out. The reason is this: If your back pay end up being zero, you don’t want to owe any fees, even if you win. So the idea of fee petitions is a backup option generally for the 25% agreement set most attorneys and non-attorneys work off of.

So keep in mind that when you are contracting with someone find out exactly what kind of help that they are going to offer you, and if they’re a law firm, and how they charge fees, and make sure that they are trustworthy and get other opinions about their ability before you sign the bottom line, and hopefully that way you’ll have to switch representatives and you will be happy in getting good help, and perhaps getting a contingency fee agreement, and you’re done.

If you have any further questions about attorney fees, or specifically fee petitions call Hoglund Law office at 1-800-850-7867. Or you can go to our website that’s displayed below, thank you. (www.HoglundLaw.com)”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Social Security Disability and Children

Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney. I’m an attorney and I practice Social Security Disability Law at Hoglund Law offices.

Today I wanted to talk to you about children’s benefits. Children can receive benefits if for instance; they have a diseased parent that had a work history. In this instance today I’m talking about children’s benefits based on their own disability. The program where children receive benefits based on their own disability is called supplemental security income. It’s a need based program. It’s also known as SSI.

When you apply for a child for SSI benefits one of the first questions Social Security asks is the financial income of where the child lives. So there are some financial need based qualifications to get in the door to be able to have social security evaluate the underlying medical condition.

Also consider that with supplemental security income the child be evaluated when they’re under 18. If on the off chance the child is under 18 when applied then turns 18 before the case is done it will actually be a child and separate decisions will be made for an adult.

The standards are whether the child meets a listing; the medical definition of disability. Or if the child has two marked on one extreme level of domains in six different domains.

If you have more questions about how childhood cases are evaluated or you have specific questions about helping you as attorneys in your childhood claim, please call Hoglund Law offices or go online at www.HoglundLaw.com”

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Who Can Represent You In a Social Security Disability Claim?

Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney. I’m an attorney. I practice Social Security law at Hoglund Law offices.
Today I’m going to talk about who can represent you if you have a Social Security Disability claim.

Technically, anyone can, someone who has not gone to school, has not finished high school, who has not ever read a medical record, or even walked into a social security office. Anyone can technically sign a form and say they represent someone else for a Social Security claim. That’s not so bad if you have a loved one helping you that cares about you, but what is very important is if you’re in a position where you’re deciding you want some professional help then you need to know what your rights are.

Social Security allows non-attorneys to do, and represent people before the social security administration and charge fees. The typical fees are a quarter of back pay, that’s what’s allowed by social security. That’s in the same way of looking at it as attorneys.

Attorneys represent people before Social Security Judges and non-attorneys. So one of the things, if you’re looking at this video, one of the things that you may be presented with is an option of having a non-attorney firm or an attorney firm. It’s absolutely your choice what I could offer or things to think about while you’re making that choice.

First, what is the training of the person that may help you or the firm that may help you? For instance, is it a law firm or is it not a law firm? If someone has training in it, do they have legal training or just regular training? If someone has legal training in this are they a licensed lawyer or not a licensed lawyer? If they are a licensed lawyer, how many hearings does your firm do generally per year? Is this side work or is this what you are primarily focused on when you work? That’s a good analysis to go through for law firms and non-law firms. If you commit to the idea that you are possibly going in front of a federal judge who is a lawyer and having experts be cross examined.

If you’ve committed to the idea of wanting an attorney then you have a right to get an attorney no matter if you have a long term disability policy and they ask that you for representation you are going to choose an attorney thee will be no additional charges for that, because for someone with long term disability, the back pay that goes back, you only pay back, in general how this works, what you pay back.

If someone has general assistance that they are getting welfare and they are requested to apply for social security again you have a choice to get an attorney. So, make sure to follow through with what you know is important because these benefits could be a few years and they could be thousands of dollars at stake.
It’s good to do it right the first time so find a representative you can trust and ask for the qualifications. If you have any further questions about Social Security Law feel free to call our offices at 1-800-850-7867. You can also go to our website at www.HoglundLaw.com

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →