Social Security Disability and Self-Employment

When Social Security receives a claim for disability benefits, the first question is whether the claimant performed Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) during the alleged period of disability. If so, the claimant is ineligible for benefits during that time. SGA is generally defined as “work that involves doing significant and productive physical or mental duties, and is done (or intended) for pay or profit.” 20 CFR § 404.1510. Each year Social Security formulates a dollar amount that is used as the benchmark for SGA. In 2016 the amount is $1,130 per month and in 2015 it was $1,090. If this amount is or was exceeded, the earnings are presumed to be SGA. Gross earnings through employment can be easily compared to these benchmarks, but earnings through self-employment require further analysis.

The applicable rules are located in sections 404.1080 through 404.1096 and Social Security Ruling 83-34. The ruling should be consulted first for a general overview. Social Security may find that self-employment constitutes SGA under one of three tests:

  1. Under the Significant Services and Substantial Income test, both elements must be met. The significant services element is met if the claimant is a sole proprietor or, if not, performing more than half of the duties of the business or more than 45 hours per month of work. For a farm landlord, the question is whether he or she “materially participates,” not through an agent. The substantial income element is met if the claimant’s average monthly net income (countable earnings) reaches the benchmark amount; if the claimant’s livelihood derived from the business is the same as before he or she became disabled, or; if the claimant’s income is comparable to that of unimpaired individuals in a same or similar business in that community. If this test is not met, Social Security proceeds to the next two tests.
  2. Under the Comparability of Work test, the work is SGA if it is comparable in all relevant factors to that of unimpaired individuals in a same or similar business in the same community. Relevant factors include hours, skills, energy output, efficiency, duties and responsibilities.
  3. Under the Worth of Work test, the work is SGA, even if it is not comparable, if it is clearly worth more than the SGA benchmark amount when considered in terms of its value to the business or when compared to the salary an owner would pay to an employee for such duties in that business setting.

 

This is a general overview and the authorities cited above should be consulted for each individual situation. There are several additional details and nuances further explained in these sources. If your claim for Social Security Disability involves self-employment earnings, consider enlisting the help of a good attorney to interpret these rules and persuade social security that they operate in your favor.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Even Pro Athletes File Bankruptcy

Many of us know the tale of Michael Vick: one of the most dynamic and talented football players of our generation, who earned more than $200 million dollars over his career only to see it all disappear. Vick was forced to file bankruptcy in 2008 after he found himself more than $20 million in debt, with no real income stream to pay them off (he was banned from the NFL after being convicted of dog fighting and animal cruelty charges in November 2008). Vick is only one of hundreds of pro athletes that have gone broke. A Sports Illustrated article form earlier this year reported that 78 percent of NFL players face bankruptcy or serious financial stress within two years of leaving the game; 60 percent of NBA players face the same financial strife within five years. Why is this?

Pro athletes make millions and sometimes hundreds of millions of dollars over their careers, so it is hard for those of us who will never make close to that understand how athletes could ever find themselves in financial difficulty. One big problem is trust. A lot of athletes came from nothing and do not trust anyone to give tax, legal, and financial advice that could ensure a lifetime of financial stability. Other athletes have the problem of trusting the wrong people and are defrauded of their millions.

Another large problem is pressure from friends and family. Athletes feel obligated to buy expensive houses and cars for those that helped them go pro. They also get a lot of pressure from family and close friends to invest in businesses even when that friend or family member may not have any idea how to run a business. Michael Vick is a prime example of this. He bought a number of cars for friends and family members, a house for his mom, a number of houses for himself. This, among other things, all led to his bankruptcy in 2008. Fortunately for Vick, he landed a $100 million contract the Philadelphia Eagles to help pay off his debts and start over.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →