Is student loan dischargeable in a Chapter 13?

Student loans are typically non-dischargeable in either a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy or in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. (In some instances, an individual can have his/her student loans discharged in a bankruptcy if the individual can show the student loans present an undue hardship. The standard for this is very high and very few individuals are able to successfully show this.)

A Chapter 13 is essentially a repayment plan where the individuals pay back their creditors based upon their income. Some people will pay the creditors 1% of what is owed to them and some will pay back 100%. The amount paid back will depend on a person’s individual circumstances. If a person owes student loans in a Chapter 13, the student loans will survive the bankruptcy and essentially be waiting for the debtor at the completion of the Chapter 13.

While the individual is in a bankruptcy, the student loan company will be treated like any other unsecured creditor if it is put into the plan. The student will only get a portion of the Chapter 13 payment if they get anything at all. The debtor will still owe the student loan company whatever has not been paid upon the completion of the bankruptcy.

If a student loan is considered long-term debt, meaning that the individual will be paying on the student loan for longer than the duration of the Chapter 13 plan even if the individual were making full payment to the student loan company, then it is permissible to allow the debtor to continue to pay the student loan company directly while the person is in the Chapter 13. In many cases, this will be a benefit to the debtor because the student loan company will be paid more during the Chapter 13 plan and the debtor will therefore owe them less when the Chapter 13 plan is completed.

Student loans are typically non-dischargeable in either a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy or in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. (In some instances, an individual can have his/her student loans discharged in a bankruptcy if the individual can show the student loans present an undue hardship. The standard for this is very high and very few individuals are able to successfully show this.)

A Chapter 13 is essentially a repayment plan where the individuals pay back their creditors based upon their income. Some people will pay the creditors 1% of what is owed to them and some will pay back 100%. The amount paid back will depend on a person’s individual circumstances. If a person owes student loans in a Chapter 13, the student loans will survive the bankruptcy and essentially be waiting for the debtor at the completion of the Chapter 13.

While the individual is in a bankruptcy, the student loan company will be treated like any other unsecured creditor if it is put into the plan. The student will only get a portion of the Chapter 13 payment if they get anything at all. The debtor will still owe the student loan company whatever has not been paid upon the completion of the bankruptcy.

If a student loan is considered long-term debt, meaning that the individual will be paying on the student loan for longer than the duration of the Chapter 13 plan even if the individual were making full payment to the student loan company, then it is permissible to allow the debtor to continue to pay the student loan company directly while the person is in the Chapter 13. In many cases, this will be a benefit to the debtor because the student loan company will be paid more during the Chapter 13 plan and the debtor will therefore owe them less when the Chapter 13 plan is completed.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


6 Questions to Ask before you Hire a Social Security Disability Lawyer

Roseville, MN.  Finding a good lawyer for your Social Security Disability and SSI claim can be difficult.  Promises on the Internet and TV ads are seemingly endless.  Finding a good lawyer, however, is important.  How can you do it?

I wrote a HoglundLaw blog last year about how to choose a lawyer for your Social Security claim.  Clarity is in order.  A good Social Security lawyer can correctly answer these 6 questions below correctly.  Before you hire a lawyer, print this out and ask these questions.  Can your potential Social Security Disability lawyer pass this test?

  1. Ask:  “Are you a licensed attorney?”  If you want representation from a lawyer who has gone to law school and can practice law, this will cut to the chase.  This is a yes or no question.
  2. Ask:  “How many hearings do you average a week?”  For most lawyers, an average of 2 or more Social Security hearings per week says a lot about their current experience and client base.
  3. Ask:  “Do you ever get into arguments with Social Security staff or judges?”  If your prospective lawyer brags about “scuffles” with Social Security, decide if he or she burns bridges.  If you smell smoke, get out!  You don’t want to be lugging around your lawyer’s baggage.  You want a persuasive lawyer.  Leave attack dogs at home.
  4. Ask:  “What do you argue other than medical evidence at Social Security hearings?”  Listen to the answer.  A good Social Security lawyer can explain how he or she will make you a real person for the judge at your hearing, not just a list of diagnoses.
  5. Ask:  “What is your win rate?”  This is a trick question.  Bad lawyers brag and induce you to hire them with a “success” rate.  Legal promises like this are unethical.  And there is another problem.  How do you think a lawyer gets a high win rate?  Cherry-picking.  Do you want to get dumped before your hearing to preserve the win rate?  A good lawyer, on the other hand, will candidly evaluate your case but not promise your result.  You want a lawyer who will stay the course.
  6. (I saved the best question for last.)  Ask:  “What do other local Social Security lawyers think about you?”  Then ask, “Can I call one that doesn’t work with you?”  A good lawyer will smile and hand you a card with a local name and a phone number.  A bad lawyer will try to explain his or her reputation.  If you might be talking with a bad lawyer, you might want to hire the new one on the card.  Good lawyers invite you to compare.

Find a good Social Security Disability lawyer.  If you have questions for our lawyers, call Hoglund Law Offices for a free consultation.

Andrew Kinney, Esq.

Attorney Andrew Kinney
Hoglund Lawyer Andrew Kinney

About the Author:  Attorney Andrew Kinney began practicing in the area of Social Security Disability Law in 1992.  He works at Hoglund Law Offices, a multi-state law firm listed in the top 100 largest law firms in Minnesota in 2010 by Lawyers Weekly.  He speaks locally and nationally, most recently on vocational expert cross-examination at a national conference in San Antonio.  He is currently a Chair of the Social Security Disability Law Section of the Minnesota State Bar Association.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


What happens when one signs up for credit counseling?

The typical credit counseling program is a repayment plan to unsecured creditors. Essentially, what a credit counselor does is negotiate a repayment plan with creditors. The plan will usually allow the debtor to pay less in interest to the creditors. Credit counseling will typically not provide for a reduction in the principle amount owed. The typical credit counseling plan lasts for five years. The payment is based upon the amount of debt owed to the creditors and the fees of the credit counseling agency.

There are a number of pitfalls involved in choosing credit counseling as an option to dealing with debt. The first issue involves the payment. Because the principle owed to the creditor is not reduced, the payments are often simply not affordable for many debtors. Also the payments are not flexible, if a person participating in a credit counseling program has a loss in income, the credit counseling payment remains the same. If a person can not make the payment, the person will be removed from the plan.

Another issue which frequently reeks havoc with credit counseling plans is that if all creditors do not agree to the plan, then those who do not agree are not bound to the plan and are free to continue to attempt to collect on the debt owed to them. For example, if one creditor holds out and is not being paid through the plan, that creditor could sue the debtor and then garnish the debtor’s wages which may make it impossible for the debtor to continue on with the credit counseling plan. It is not uncommon for a creditor to refuse to participate in a credit counseling plan especially if the creditor already has obtained a judgment against the debtor or if the debt has already been turned over to a collection agency.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


U.S. Postal Service Close to Bankruptcy

The U.S. Postal Service has been struggling financially. Patrick R. Donahoe, the postmaster general, has stated that if Congress does not take action the agency will not be able to make a $5.5 billion payment this month and may be forced to shut down this winter. Recently, the Postal Service has proposed cuts to eliminate a deficit that will rise to $9.2 billion this year. The proposed cuts include ending Saturday delivery, closing 3,700 locations, and laying off 120,000 employees.

The financial problems can be attributed to lower revenue and increasing costs for the Postal Service. Fewer people and businesses are utilizing post office services, largely because of increased Internet usage. Additionally, the Postal Service has contractual obligations to its employees, including no-layoff provisions, which have resulted in increased costs. Labor costs account for 80% of the Postal Service’s expenses, compared to 53% at UPS and 32% at FedEx. Postal Service employees also receive better health benefits than other government employees.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees will consider the Postal Service’s situation this week. Democrats and Republicans have been unable to reach an agreement on a solution. If the Postal Service does miss the $5.5 billion payment due at the end of September, an emergency will not immediately occur. However, in early 2012, the Postal Service will be unable to pay for its operations and will have to shut down.

 

 

Source:

Steven Greenhouse, Postal Service on Verge of Going Broke, Shutting Down, https://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44396682/ns/business-us_business/#.TmUMDzuF4ro (accessed September 5, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Americans Are Reducing Credit Card Debt

According to TransUnion, a credit bureau, consumer credit card debt in the U.S. has decreased to $4,699 per borrower. This represents a 5% decrease since the second quarter of 2010, and is near a 10 year low. The decrease is considered positive news for the struggling economy. Additionally, the number of borrowers who were at least 90 days late with their credit card payments decreased 0.6% over the same period. This represents a 17 year low.

The decrease in credit card debt can be attributed to both lenders and borrowers. Lenders have decreased debt by writing off debt that has become uncollectible, closing bad accounts, and reducing credit offered to risky borrowers. Consumers have also been responsible for decreasing credit card debt by making their payments. From the first quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2010, Americans made $72 billion more in payments on their credit cards than purchases. That is comparable to $86.6 billion in write offs by lenders.

DailyFinance.com offers five tips to get out of credit card debt. First, track your income and spending. It is important to make a budget for 30 or 60 days to find money you can use to pay off your debt. Second, keep track of the details. Use online calculators to find out how much an extra few hundred dollars in payment will make. If you come in under budget for the month use the extra money to pay off debt. Third, contact your lenders to see if they will reduce your interest rate. Fourth, start with the highest interest rate card and pay off your debt in order of interest rate. Finally, when you get out of debt put the money used to make payments in a savings account. You should save enough money to cover three months of expenses, so an emergency does not put you back into debt.

 

 

Source:

Laura Rowley, U.S. Consumers Pay Down Their Credit Card Debts, https://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/08/17/u-s-credit-card-debt-declines/ (accessed August 24, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Consumer Bankruptcies Decrease in July

Consumer Bankruptcies Decrease in July

According to the American Bankruptcy Institute, consumer bankruptcy filings in July were down 18% from July 2010. Nationally, 113,470 consumer bankruptcies were filed in July of this year. In July 2010, 137,698 consumer bankruptcies were filed. The decrease in July continues the downward trend in bankruptcy filings in 2011. The number of filings in July represents the seventh straight month in which bankruptcy filings were lower than 2010 filings.  July consumer bankruptcy filings were also down 5% from the number filed in June of this year.

Samuel J. Gerdano, the Executive Director of the American Bankruptcy Institute, has said that “the continued decline in consumer bankruptcies in tandem with a sluggish economy is a reflection of the deleveraging of household debts and tightening of consumer credit over the past year.” Total consumer bankruptcy filings for 2011 are expected to be lower than the number filed in 2010.

 

Source:

July Consumer Bankruptcy Filings Fall 18 Percent From Last Year, https://www.abiworld.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=64221&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm (accessed August 9, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Burt Reynolds Facing Foreclosure

Burt Reynolds Facing Foreclosure

Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation has sued Burt Reynolds over his Florida home. According to the lawsuit, the 75-year-old actor is behind $1.2 million on the mortgage for his home in Hobe Sound, Florida. Reynolds has not made a payment on the home since September 2010. BankAtlantic holds a second mortgage of $750,000 on the home and was also named in the lawsuit. Reynolds’ Florida home is 12,500 square feet and is valued at $2.4 million. The actor attempted to sell the home in 2009, listing the property at $8.9 million. However, a poor housing market and high asking price made it difficult to sell the home.

The foreclosure suit is not the first time Reynolds has faced financial difficulty. In the 1990s, Reynolds filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after a divorce and poor career and investment choices. Reynolds also owns a home in Little Rock, Arkansas. He is currently filming a made for TV movie.

 

Source:

Tim Kenneally, Burt Reynolds Slapped with Foreclosure Lawsuit over Florida Home, https://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=664577&GT1=28101 (accessed August 18, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Payday Loans Dangerous For Borrowers

Payday loans are short-term loans offered by lenders as an advance on the borrower’s paycheck. Payday loan lenders are located in stores and online. Generally, it is a good idea to take out a payday loan only if it can be paid back immediately. Payday loans are one of the most expensive types of credit. The loans carry high interest rates, and interest adds up quickly if payment is not made on time. It is not uncommon for borrowers of payday loans to pay 700 or 800% interest. Payday loans are usually easy to get. The money usually is transferred in a few hours, and borrowers only need a paystub to prove they are employed. In most circumstances, payday loans are dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Payday loans often are targeted to people who cannot afford them. Additionally, most lenders do not sufficiently disclose the interest rates and other costs. Borrowers who apply for online payday loans have to be careful to avoid enrolling in additional programs. Online applications often include opportunities to sign up for unrelated programs, such as travel, phone, or Internet plans. A borrower can easily become enrolled in these programs and will be charged every month. Regulation of payday loans varies from state to state. The predatory behavior by lenders has caused many to question the existence of payday loans.

 

 

Source:

Sheryl Nance-Nash, How Online Payday Loans Can Get You in Trouble, https://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/08/10/how-online-payday-loans-can-get-you-in-trouble/ (accessed August 14, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Past Relevant Work


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability Law.  Today I wanted to talk about past relevant work.

It’s a phrase that Social Security uses a lot. It means the work you used to do within the last 15 years.  Why is past relevant work important to your case?  Well, when social security makes decisions about disability insurance and supplemental security income they go through a process.  They decide first if someone is currently working, it’s called SJ issues.  Then they look to what medical problems affect work in a basic way.  It’s called a severities step. The third step is deciding if the individual meets or equals any sort of definition or listing of disability.  The fourth step finally is can you return to you past relevant work; what you used to do?  And they have definitions of what you used to do exactly as opposed to what you used to do in the general category.  There is another step after that as to your ability to perform other work.  But in terms of performing past relevant work social security evaluates your past relevant work in every single case.

Now the essence of past relevant work is you probably know you can’t return to your past work if you’re applying for benefits, the medical standard is can you work full time at either your past work or other work.  That generally applies to most people depending on age.  So practically speaking, most people who are considering disability or have applied for social security disability benefits don’t think they can return to their past relevant work.

Now here’s the crux of the problem. Social Security, at least when you’re under 50, now will consider if you can return to not just what you used to do perhaps a specialist in something, skilled craftsman, maybe a lawyer. Social security will look not to whether you can return to that job let’s say you had a stroke and can’t concentrate too well they’ll consider that people under 50 whether they can return to other work as well.  So you can benefit greatly from having some legal advice as to whether you should apply or if you have applied how do I meet my definition of disability because if the only thing you can’t do is your past work you can probably perform some other part time work in some other capacity.   Your attorney is going to need to make arguments that you are by definition disabled.  You are by definition disabled if you meet certain criteria.  And again I’ll mention stroke but it can be any matter of health problems.  A lot of the health problems are listed under our disability library at www.HoglundLaw.com

The other instance where past relevant work actually is very important though is if you are over 50 or within 6 months of age 50.  And this can happen after you apply or can happen after you have your pending appeal.  In that case social security looks to see if you have physical restrictions first.  If physically you’re limited to sit down work or sedentary work.  And the definition of sedentary is within social security’s regulations.  As absorbed to the dictionary of occupational title.  Social Security looks to see if you can’t return to your past work and you’re limited to sit down work, if you’re over 50, and you don’t have skills that could shift into other sort of sedentary work you can be what’s called gridded out.  There are some guidelines that social security uses for people over 50 and that’s again an instance where past relevant work is crucial.

If you have questions about past relevant work please feel free, if you don’t already have an attorney call our office at 1-800-850-7867 you can also go on our website at www.HoglundLaw.com.  Hopefully this information can help you.  If we can actually represent you that’s wonderful.  But keep in mind that these concepts are specific to Social Security so getting to know them is very important.  Thank you.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Submitting Evidence After Social Security Hearing


Video Transcription:

Hi my name is Andrew Kinney and I’m a Social Security attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  Today I wanted to talk about submitting evidence after your social security hearing.

Social security has hearings for people who are applying for disability insurance and supplemental security income.  First, there is an application, in most cases a reconsideration stage, and then a hearing.  The hearing is with a federal administrative law judge that looks at your medical records and decides your case based on that your testimony and other factors.

The subject today is unique because most times you should get your medical evidence in before your social security hearing, not after.  But sometimes you don’t have a choice.  Usually, what I see if we get involved in a social security claim and someone is unrepresented is that all the evidence was not to the judge on time.  Usually, when that happens we’re helping at the level after the appeals counsel level.  So we’re submitting evidence that should have been available before the hearing way too late, I would argue.  In social security claims its important all along the way to make sure social security has all the updated medical records at all the stages I talked about.  But what is particularly important, at least by when  your hearing is scheduled, is that you do a final push and get all the updated records from all the medical sources so that they’re available at the hearing.

In the situation at hand here, when I’m talking about submitting records after the hearing, one of challenges is that at some point after the hearing the judge will have a written decision.  The date of that written decision will be the last day the judge will look at this stuff for now.  You have an unknown deadline after a hearing to submit medical evidence.  What do you do about it?  Well, if you have an attorney with you at the hearing the attorney should ask to hold a record open. Typically, we ask the judge “Don’t make a decision your honor until we can get these specific records.”  Generally, judges have a deadline for that.  Now if you don’t have that agreement then you really don’t know if you’ll have time to get updated medical evidence.  So a backup option, particularly if you’re unrepresented is to call your hearing office after the hearing and talk to the assistant to the judge and ask can the judge not make a decision because there was some evidence that I forgot.

The basic idea here is you can get evidence in after a hearing at least according to the current law, but it’s not ideal in fact by any stretch of the imagination. You should at all cost try to get evidence in before.   If you do submit records after your hearing your attorney should submit a brief if at all possible explaining why these record are relevant in fact. Also it should be explained why they’re relevant and that the judge should look at them when the judge may have made a decision in the case but has not committed it to writing.  If you have more questions about Social Security benefits, applying for social security, or in the case of here, how should I handle my evidence in my social security claim well be happy to talk with you.  You can call 1-800-850-7867.  You can also go online at www.HoglundLaw.com and look up these sorts of issues.  Hopefully this helped today.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Over 50? Why Age Matters In A Social Security Disability Claim?


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability Law.  Today I wanted to talk about why age matters in social security claims.

We help many, many people.  Some are younger some are older.  Social Security Law treats older people differently, specifically people over 50.  Why does that matter?  Well the standards change at age 50.  Some people call it a grid, but Social Security calls it a medical vocational guideline.  What does that mean?  When you’re trying to prove you’re unable to work, you are left confronting the social security process. It’s very, very important to know what the standards are.

What would allow you to be approved?  If you’re over 50 and you have physical problems that require you to sit-down or do sedentary work, that may allow you an automatic approval with certain criteria met.  If you can’t return to your past relevant work, or what you used to do the last 15 years, there’s another video on past relevant work specifically.  So if you’re under 50  you maybe approved for Social Security benefits. But, if you’re over 50 or will soon be over 50 you could take advantage of the easier guidelines to be approved.

Now you don’t have to be limited to sedentary work only if you’re over 55 you might be limited to light level work, and social security has definitions of what light means, but you’re limited to certain physical kinds of work and you can’t return to your past work you might be able to be approved to social security easier. So, it’s good to know how your age matters.

If you have more questions about Social Security law, grids in particular feel free to go to our website at www.HoglundLaw.com.  You can also call us at 1-800-850-7867 if you think you might want to have a lawyer help you.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Top 5 Things To Know About Your SS Hearing


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I practice Social Security Law at Hoglund Law offices.  Today I wanted to talk about the 5 top things you need to know about your Social Security hearing.

Number one:  Why do you have a Social Security hearing?  Well at the Social Security process you have an application, reconsideration, and then you get to a hearing.  The hearing is different than the prior 2 stages because at the hearing you get to talk to the decision maker.  Who is the decision maker?  A judge.  You talk directly to a judge about your medical problems. The hearing itself can be an informal process. It’s a private conference room in which you can explain your situation and your day-to-day limits to someone.

The next thing you know: Two.  Who is at the hearing?  There’s the judge that I mentioned, you’re certainly there, it would be good to have an attorney there to cross-examine the experts.  There’s always, almost always I should say, a vocational expert.  Sometimes there is a medical expert either a psychologist or a medical doctor.  And finally there is a hearing monitor.  That hearing monitor makes sure a hearing goes smoothly.  There can be your family members sitting in back.  Keep in mind that I’m giving general ideas.

The third thing you need to know about your social security hearing is what happens at it? As I mentioned you’re giving testimony at the hearing.  You’re talking to the judge under oath about why you can’t work and specifically how you’re limited.  The medical records tell the judge what’s wrong with you. But, you’re saying well here’s how much I can lift, here’s how much I can carry, here’s how much I can walk, here’s how my depression affects my daily life, here’s how many anxiety attacks I have per month, or per week. There are many reasons people can’t work. The medical reasons involve functional limitations.  Keep in mind these is a video on what’s called an RFC about that topic.

The fourth thing you need to know about your hearing, how long is it?  Well that’s easy.  Generally hearings are between a half hour and an hour.  Now, that can vary as well.  In the hearing there is at least one expert, the vocational expert. The judge will ask you questions, then your attorney will ask you questions. Then the judge turns to at least the vocational expert ask questions and your attorney follows up with that as well.  The attorney should give a closing argument.  Hearings last about an hour, but different judges have different styles, and these judges are federal judges and whatever style they have its their hearing.  Just make sure you ask your attorney what’s this judge like?  An experienced attorney will let you know if they ask questions and maybe you need to ask what they mean again.  What’s important is that there is a personality to each of these judges and what’s important for your attorney to do is explain what the judge is like so it helps you have fewer questions at the hearing.

Finally, the fifth thing that you need to know about your hearing is when you get a decision.  I get this question a lot, usually before the hearing.  Sometimes it’s the cart before the horse because you need to get the hearing done first but it’s good to know what happens next.  Generally decisions are made between 2 and 4 months after the decision is in writing but there are exceptions to that, some judges use what’s called bench decisions. That would mean that you would get a decision from the judge, on the record at the hearing. Generally those are always favorable decisions.  But, ultimately you get a decision in writing after the hearing.  And if you have an expectation you can always be surprised if these is a decision that comes sooner.

Hopefully these 5 things you need to know about your Social Security hearing was helpful.  If you have more information about what to expect at a Social Security hearing, I happen to write a guide called a client’s guide to Social Security hearings.  You can just look at the search with those as search terms.  Look under client guide to social security hearings and hopefully you see the Hoglund law guide that shows a step-by-step more detailed than this video.

If you have more questions about just wanting help with your Social Security claim, about applying or appealing were happy to talk with you, you can call us at 1-800-850-7867, the number on our screen.  If there is any way we can help you we want to.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


5 Reasons To Get An Attorney – Handling your own Social Security Case


Video Transcription:

“Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability Law.  I also help people with supplemental security income, otherwise known as SSI.  Today I wanted to talk about why it may not be in your best interest to handle your own social security case.

Well, I have 5 reasons.  First, when you apply, it’s very important is that your application is complete.  You can apply online or in person or you can apply over the phone.  What you don’t know though is, is everything in?  Do they have all the information they need?  And ultimately, did I choose the right date when I said I first couldn’t work?  That isn’t always obvious.

The second reason why you may not want to handle your want social security case is that you have to appeal at every step within a certain deadline.  So you have an application stage, a reconsideration stage, a hearing stage, and what’s called the appeals counsel after the hearing stage.  There are deadlines between each of those stages, and if you miss those deadlines you perhaps could have good cause. But, generally you cannot expect to do anything but start over if you miss appeals.

A third reason why not to handle your own social security case is that during the process you can get input from doctors beyond medical records.  What form of input would help?  What do doctors need to comment on?  How can doctors comment on it?  Who gets it if you get a letter form a doctor?  Are there better forms or charts that would otherwise be available?  These are issues that a lawyer can help you with.

A fourth reason to perhaps why not handle your social security case on your own is one of the two most important reasons.  The fourth reason is that you’re at a hearing.  The judge is a federal judge, you’re in a private conference room, with a tape running.  You’ve given a testimony, the judge is a trained lawyer, there is generally always a job expert in there trained in social security law, wondering whether you can do work, there may even be a medical expert in there talking about your own medical records and wondering whether the standards that disability has are met.  So if you think about it, you’re in a hearing and you have to give your own testimony about why you don’t feel well, why you’re disabled, why you haven’t returned to work and what work you worked for.  You have to be ready to cross examine these experts.  So keep in mind that if you want this kind of help, if you want a trained attorney that does hearings all the time, it’s easy enough within reason to try to hire someone late in the game.  But don’t wait any later if you decide you need a lawyer.

The fifth reason and I would think the biggest reason that you should perhaps consider not handling your own social security case is that you don’t feel well.  If you have a medical problem particularly a psychological problem or maybe chronic pain that affects your ability to concentrate, handling your own social security case alone is very, very difficult enough, let alone not feeling well.  So, if you keep that in mind, knowing that you don’t feel well, feel free to call our offices at www.HoglundLaw.com.  You can also call us at 1-800-850-7867.  Thank you.”

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Adaptative Functioning


Video Transcription:

Hi, my name is Andrew Kinney.  I’m an attorney at Hoglund Law offices.  I practice Social Security Disability.  Today I’m going to talk a little more about cases involving borderline intellectual functioning.

I have a previous video that discusses the basics of how social security uses definitions of disability to defining impairments with IQ scores.  What I’m going to talk about now is more specific, adaptive functioning.  Adaptive functioning is claimants have been able to survive and actually thrive in a work environment.  That’s a good thing, but that doesn’t always happen.  So if you are pursuing social security benefits on borderline intellectual functioning, or social security calls it mental retardation under listing 1205 C, It is very important for your attorney to know that we have evidence of adaptive functioning.

functioning, because if an individual has shown, despite the work history, they only worked alongside family members or close friends with understanding bosses, they may not have adapted properly. So in those situations, if someone has not adapted then that would be evidence of it, and so I would perhaps have a family member testify at the hearing, that they helped them get the job, they showed up at the job during lunch, they had interactions with the boss.

It comes down to this:  Sometimes jobs that people do look like they’ve adapted and can function well, and that’s a good thing, but sometimes the actual job the way its performed is more toward sheltered workshops or sheltered work.  That sort of work is done with direct supervision and its different than competitive work.

There are other examples of where adaptive functioning comes into play.  For instance, if they went back to school and learned a specific skill or not.  There are also questions about day-to-day activities.  Reading the paper, basic functions, taking the bus.  There are a lot of other examples about what adaptive functioning actually is and it’s important at hearings to get evidence of it.  If you have further questions about adaptive functioning, borderline intellectual functioning in general, or just about getting benefits for social security disability please feel free to call our offices at 1-800-850-7867.  You can also go to www.HoglundLaw.com.  Thank you.

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Taxes On Credit Cards

Don’t charge taxes on a credit card before filing

When preparing to file a bankruptcy, there are a number of things which an individual should not do. One of these is to use a credit card or loan to pay taxes.

If one pays for owed taxes by charging them on a credit card or taking out a loan, the credit card company or creditor will be able to object to the discharge of that debt. There is a rule in bankruptcy that allows a creditor to object to the discharge of a debt that was incurred because a debtor used that creditor’s loan to pay taxes if the taxes were charged or paid within the last year.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


How to Understand Debt and Avoid Problems

Despite all the negative headlines, debt is not always bad. Good debt can allow people to do what they otherwise could not, including, going to college, or buying a house or car. Bad debt is used to make purchases that are not necessary and purchases the borrower cannot afford. One way to determine if something is good debt or bad debt is the interest rate. Generally, good debt is more affordable and can be tax deductible. There is an additional type of debt in-between good and bad debt, which can be referred to as “convenience debt.” This debt represents the monthly credit card balance that builds up because it is easier to pay for purchases with a credit card. Convenience debt should be paid off on time each month to avoid interest charges.
It is important to remember that the fastest way to get out of debt is to pay off the most expensive debt first. Therefore, if you are behind on more than one credit card, you should put the most money toward paying off the most expensive card and pay the minimum balance on the others. Another important step is to take care of your credit report and credit score. To maintain a high credit score you should pay bills on time, pay down credit card debt to below 10% of the card’s limit, do not apply for new credit cards or close credit card accounts, and maintain a history of paying phone and utility bills on time.
If debt becomes overwhelming or something occurs that will make repayment more difficult, inform creditors of what has happened. Many companies will be willing to work with you by lowering interest rates or fees, extending the term of the debt, or reducing the amount of debt.

Source:
Jean Chatzky, How To Avoid Debt Problems Before They Start, https://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/31507914/ns/today-money/ (accessed August 1, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Farmers Pay Tax On Bankruptcy Sale

The Supreme Court recently granted an appeal from Lynwood and Brenda Hall, farmers who were compelled to sell their farm in bankruptcy. The farm was sold for $960,000, and the proceeds were used to resolve the Halls’ bankruptcy debts. As a result of the sale, the Halls owed $26,000 in capital gains taxes. The Halls attempted to pay a portion of the capital gains taxes, but wanted some of taxes discharged by the bankruptcy court. The IRS insisted that the entire $26,000 be paid. The case ended up in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco. The 9th Circuit Court ruled in favor of the IRS. The United States Supreme Court granted the Halls’ petition for review, and will ultimately decide whether the taxes must be paid.

Source:

Associated Press, Supreme Court to Decide Whether Couple Must Pay Tax on Bankruptcy Sale of Family Farm, https://www.startribune.com/nation/123747189.html (accessed June 21, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Young Americans Feel Empowered By Debt

New research conducted at Ohio State University indicates that 18 to 27 year olds feel empowered by their debt. The study found that a greater amount of education loan and credit card debt corresponded to higher self-esteem. Additionally, young people with high debt feel more in control of their lives. (Anand)

The study compared information about credit card and student loan debt with participants’ self-esteem and feelings about their ability to accomplish goals and control their lives. Lower income people were the most affected by their debt. Participants with the lowest income felt the most empowered, with higher debt corresponding to higher self-esteem. Young people in the middle class felt no effect from student loan debt, but experienced higher self esteem by holding more credit card debt. Participants with the highest income felt no self-esteem increase from either education or credit card debt. (ScienceDaily)

Researchers also found that at age 28 young people start to realize the consequences of their debt. At 28, study participants felt more stress about their debt, understood that they may have overestimated their future income, and realized paying off their debts would not be easy. (ScienceDaily)

Source:

Anika Anand, Young Adults Wear Their Debt Like a New Tattoo, https://lifeinc.today.com/_news/2011/06/08/6814827-young-adults-wear-their-debt-like-a-new-tattoo (accessed June 21, 2011).

 

What, Me Worry? Young Adults Get Self-Esteem Boost From Debt, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110606113401.htm (accessed June 21, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Will Social Security Checks Be Paid If Debt Ceiling Is Not Raised

Will Social Security Checks Be Paid If Debt Ceiling Is Not Raised

Around 28 million Americans are expecting to receive their Social Security checks on August 3, and 27 million are expecting their checks later in August. However, if Congress does not reach a deal to raise the national debt ceiling by the deadline of August 2, it is unknown if Social Security checks will be sent out. President Obama has warned Americans that the federal government may not be able to pay Social Security beneficiaries if a deal is not reached.

This is one of the few times Congress has failed to raise the debt ceiling when it has become necessary. Therefore, it is unclear what will happen if the debt limit is not raised by August 2. It is clear that the government will not be able to pay its bills in August. Estimates claim the government will be $134 billion short by the end of August.

Some have suggested that Social Security should use money from its trust fund to pay beneficiaries in August. However, Treasury Department officials do not support drawing from the trust fund. The trust fund holds IOUs, not actual money, that would have to be redeemed by the Treasury Department. Many Americans disagree and believe that President Obama can use the trust fund to make Social Security payments if necessary.

Source:

Tami Luhby, Debt Ceiling: Will I Get My Social Security Check?, https://money.cnn.com/2011/07/28/news/economy/debt_ceiling_social_security/index.htm?iid=HP_River (accessed July 29, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


What is a deed in lieu of foreclosure?

What is a deed in lieu of foreclosure?

With so many individuals unable to afford to keep their homes, many people are looking for ways to walk away from their home.

One option is to do a deed in lieu of foreclosure. When a person signs a deed in lieu of foreclosure, the person is essentially signing the property over to the mortgage without forcing the mortgage company to go through a foreclosure to reclaim the property. When a property is foreclosed upon, the mortgage company must follow state laws which set up a number of steps a mortgage company must complete in order to take over possession of the property. This can be a drawn out process and typically the mortgage company will incur costs such as attorney’s fees when undertaking a foreclosure.

When an individual signs a deed in lieu of foreclosure that person is essentially giving the mortgage company permission to bypass the foreclosure process and take back possession of the property immediately.

Clearly, in this situation the mortgage company benefits by skipping over the expensive step of foreclosure; however, the property more quickly enters onto their books as a foreclosed property. Some mortgage companies have “Cash for Keys” programs that will offer financial compensation for owners willing to vacate their property more quickly.

The benefit for the homeowner in a deed in lieu of foreclosure is not as obvious. Many individuals believe that their credit will be spared by doing a deed in lieu of foreclosure. This is not the case. A deed in lieu of foreclosure can still adversely affect a person’s credit score.

In addition, when a person signs the deed in lieu of foreclosure that person is giving up his or her right to occupy the property during the redemption period. In Minnesota as in many states, a homeowner is allowed a time period after a sheriff sale to try to refinance the property or pay off the entire mortgage in full in order to keep the home. During the redemption period, the homeowner is entitled to keep possession of the home. In Minnesota, this period typically last 6 months. In certain circumstances it can last a full year. Essentially this means that a person can lose their home to a foreclosure and yet remain in the property until the redemption period expires. During this time the homeowner’s name remains on the title of the property and the homeowner is responsible for the property. The homeowner is not required to make mortgage payments on the property during this time and therefore has a chance to save up money that would have been spent on rent.

Signing a deed in lieu of foreclosure ends this right. It can however occasionally be in a homeowner’s best interest to sign a deed in lieu of foreclosure. For example, if an individual has already moved out of the property, having their name remain on the title is a liability for them if the property is not being maintained.  For example, if the lawn is not mowed, the city could cite the homeowner for the violation.

Another concern that an individual should have when considering signing a deed in lieu of foreclosure is whether the mortgage company will choose to go after the homeowner for a deficiency balance if the property subsequently sells for less than the homeowner owes the mortgage company. One should be wary about signing an agreement that makes them responsible for the difference.

Not all mortgage companies will willingly allow a homeowner to sign a deed in lieu of foreclosure straight away. Often the mortgage company will force the homeowner to put the property up for sale before considering the option of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. A homeowner may incur unnecessary costs in doing this.

Whether or not signing a deed in lieu of foreclosure is in a person’s best interest depends on a number of factors. Before making such a decision, an individual would be wise to consult with an attorney regarding their options.

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


How Americans Are Reducing Spending

Many Americans are facing difficult financial situations. Results from a new Harris study show how consumers are reducing their expenses. (Today) The survey asked consumers to respond to whether they had thought about using different methods of saving money in the past six months. The results are listed below, along with the percentage of those surveyed that considered the method. (DailyFinance)

  1. Saving money at the grocery store, 67%
  2. Packing a lunch instead of buying one, 46%
  3. Going to a hairstylist less often, 43%
  4. Switching to reusable water bottles instead of buying bottled water, 39%
  5. Ending magazine subscriptions, 31%
  6. Reducing amount of dry cleaning, 24%
  7. Cancelling or reducing cable TV service, 22%
  8. Stopping morning coffee purchases, 21%
  9. Ending newspaper subscriptions, 18%

10.  Ending landline phone service, 16%

11.  Ending or reducing cell phone service, 14%

12.  Using public transportation or carpooling, 14%

 

 

Source:

12 Ways Americans Are Cutting Back on Spending, https://lifeinc.today.com/_news/2011/07/06/7029594-12-ways-americans-are-cutting-back-on-spending (accessed July 10, 2011).

 

Top 10 Ways Americans Are Cutting Back on Spending, https://www.dailyfinance.com/photos/top-ways-americans-are-cutting-everyday-spending/4276496/?icid=sphere_copyright# (accessed July 10, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


How Should an Experienced Social Security Lawyer Handle Evidence at your Social Security Disability Hearing?

Hoglund Lawyer Andrew Kinney

Legal strategy is important in Social Security benefits claims.  That is why many people applying for Social Security disability benefits (and SSI benefits) hire a law firm with licensed lawyers and experienced paralegals to help them.  One area of legal strategy involves the best way to manage the medical evidence in your claim. It can take a long time to get your hearing day with a judge for your Social Security disability benefits claim.  Once you have your hearing, should your lawyer simply wait for the decision?  Not necessarily.

Hearings for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) claims and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) claims involve medical evidence. All medical evidence should be requested and submitted electronically as soon as it is received so it is available before the scheduled hearing day for review by your judge and the experts. Sometimes, for whatever reason, not all the evidence is available on the hearing day.  Also, sometimes there is other evidence that will support your medical treatment evidence.  What is it?  How can your lawyer submit it?  This depends on the kind of evidence that you need to prove your claim and the experience of your law firm.

Unimportant evidence

Not all evidence carries the same weight in your claim for Social Security benefits.  If there is missing evidence on the hearing day that is non-essential to your claim, your lawyer should explain that — in his or her legal judgment — this evidence will not make a difference in your case.  For example, if you have depression as your primary disability, new chiropractic records for a minor back problem are unlikely going to impact the judge’s decision.

Slow Treating Sources

If the missing evidence is essential to your claim, such as from a regular treating source, your lawyer should ask the judge to “hold the hearing record open” to receive these records post-hearing. This offers extra protection to avoid a decision before the missing evidence gets into the post-hearing record.  For example, if your MRI of your lower back was taken three weeks before your hearing, it may be available soon after the hearing.  In a back case, this can be critical evidence.  Your lawyer would ask the ALJ to hold the record open to receive the MRI, usually with a deadline.  Your lawyer may also submit a legal argument along with this post-hearing evidence if necessary to emphasize the relevance of the new test. Licensed legal training matters.

Subpoenas

What if your law firm, despite due diligence, cannot get your medical provider to release important records before (and even after) a hearing?  If the medical evidence is essential to your claim, your lawyer should request the ALJ to subpoena these records.  At Hoglund Law Offices, a subpoena request is rare.  We try to avoid them by making multiple record requests and follow-ups.  Under the right circumstances, though, an ALJ’s subpoena for medical records gets results.  Your lawyer should be familiar with the regulations about subpoenas.  Your claim may hinge on this evidence.  If you are unsure about your law firm’s experience in this area, ask.

Forgotten Treatment

What if you forget to tell your law firm about medical treatment before the hearing?  Regretfully, this can happen.  Tell your lawyer immediately about this — even after a hearing.  Your lawyer can only request records he or she knows about.  Sometimes your lawyer can request a judge to hold the record open after the hearing by explaining what happened.  Sometimes simply submitting the new records is the only option.  New evidence may, at a minimum, be relevant on appeal.  Ask your law firm about strategies for Appeals Council appeals.  Good lawyers plan how they would appeal every case, including yours.

Uncovering New Evidence

How does a Social Security law firm with experience where you live help you?  Good local law offices can have intuitions about where related medical records are.  Your law firm’s experience and persistence with your region’s different medical facilities can help ensure that requests, once made, get where they need to.  But even the best intuition still needs your help.  If you haven’t had a hearing yet, try to write down everywhere you have received treatment — especially since you stopped working.  A one-time visit with a neurologist can make a difference in your claim depending on the other medical evidence.  All treatment can count.  Your lawyer can ultimately decide what’s important.  At Hoglund Law Offices, our lawyers make these kinds of decisions all the time.

Creative Evidence

Your law firm’s experience can count, particularly when it comes to creative evidence.  Evidence is not limited to traditional medical records.  At Hoglund Law Offices, we find alternative evidence can be strong secondary support for medical treatment records. Depending on the situation, we can submit county forms from physicians for welfare benefits, VA benefits decisions, court commitment evaluations, personal medical journals, workers’ compensation evaluations, child custody documentation of inability to work, vocational training records, and the list goes on. Sometimes a point of contention first arises at the hearing.  In these situations, a post-hearing treating medical opinion can “plug a hole” in the evidence.

Hopefully after reading this, you can see how legal experience can impact what your lawyer and your law firm does before and after your Social Security hearing.  How your lawyer handles your evidence can make a difference.  If you have questions about Hoglund Law Offices or our Hoglund Lawyers, please feel free to visit HoglundLaw.com or call us toll-free at 1-855-780-4357.

 

Andrew Kinney, Esq.

*** Attorney Andrew Kinney speaks locally, statewide, and nationally on Social Security Disability Law.  If you wish for him to speak or train at your upcoming professional function, please contact his offices for details.  For examples of topics in our Hoglund Lawyer Disability Library, click here:  Top 5 Ways to get Approved for Social Security Benefits.

 

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Supreme Court Rules Against Estate of Anna Nicole Smith

The Supreme Court recently ruled against the estate of the late model Anna Nicole Smith. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that Smith was wrongly awarded $400 million from the estate of her late husband by a bankruptcy court. When she was 26, Smith married wealthy oil executive J. Howard Marshall, who was 89. Marshall died just one year later and left everything to his son Pierce. A probate court in Texas awarded the estate to Pierce after Smith sued. However, Smith filed for bankruptcy in California and made claims that Pierce withheld money that Marshall had promised her. The bankruptcy court agreed with Smith and awarded her $400 million.

The Supreme Court case addressed the conflicting rulings by the Texas and California courts. The Court held that the United States Constitution prevents bankruptcy courts from ruling on claims outside of bankruptcy law. This means the California bankruptcy court was prevented from granting damages on tort claims. Therefore, the ruling from the Texas court stands and Marshall’s whole estate was awarded to Pierce.

The parties involved in the case did not live to see the outcome. In 2007, Smith died from an accidental overdose. Marshall’s son, Pierce, also died while the case was pending.

 

Source:

Newscore, Estate of Anna Nicole Smith Loses at Supreme Court,

https://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/estate_of_anna_nicole_smith_loses_tdc2FYsQQPIXCPZkKnE3aI (accessed June 28, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Popular Restaurant Chains May Be At Risk For Bankruptcy

According to new research, popular food chains Denny’s, Wendy’s and Domino’s may be in danger of going bankrupt. TheStreet.com ranked restaurants’ chances of going bankrupt by their Altman Z-Score. The score is based on financial information from each company, and predicts the likelihood of bankruptcy within two years. TheStreet has been using their scoring system since 1968, and they claim to have a 72% rate of accuracy in predicting bankruptcies two years before the filing.

Denny’s is the restaurant most at risk for bankruptcy, according to the most recent ranking. Wendy’s/Arby’s came in second, and Domino’s Pizza was fifth. Additionally, DineEquity, which operates Applebee’s and IHOP, ranked fourth on the list. Other restaurant chains, including Sbarro, Perkins and Marie Callender’s, have already filed for bankruptcy this year.

 

Source:

Pete Kenworthy, Report: Denny’s, Wendy’s and Domino’s Among Restaurants in Danger of Bankruptcy, https://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/national/wews-report-dennys-wendysand-dominos-among-restaurants-in-danger-of-bankruptcy1309574048690 (accessed July 3, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Regional Bank President Wants Tax Reform To Lower Debt

Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Federal Reserve Bank in Minneapolis, recently suggested a change in the U.S. tax system to discourage debt growth. High consumer and bank debt lowers the stability of the economy. This makes economic trouble, like what occurred in 2007 through 2009, more likely.

Currently, the tax code encourages debt by allowing taxpayers to take advantage of interest deductions. Consumers are encouraged to incur mortgage debt and banks are encouraged to take on debt for financing. Kocherlakota urged Congress to reduce the deduction for mortgage interest and reduce the interest deduction for corporations. This would reduce the incentives for people to take on debt that destabilizes the economy.

Officials are attempting to avoid another economic downturn. President Obama signed a bill last year that gives the Federal Reserve the power to supervise financial institutions whose failure could cause an economic crisis.

 

Source:

Vivien Lou Chen, Fed’s Kocherlakota Calls for Tax-system Changes to Discourage Debt

Growth, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-27/fed-s-kocherlakota-calls-for-tax-systemchanges-to-discourage-debt-growth.html (accessed June 28, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


L.A. Dodgers Baseball Team Files Bankruptcy

The Los Angeles Dodgers have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware. Dodger’s owner Frank McCourt was relying on a TV deal worth billions to help ease financial troubles. However, Major League Baseball did not approve the deal. McCourt is asking for time to secure another media deal, and he is seeking $150 million to finance daily expenses. The Dodgers owe millions to former players, who have filed claims. The team has also experienced a substantial decrease in fan attendance at games.

The Dodgers likely would have been unable to make their next payroll. McCourt filed for bankruptcy before a takeover by MLB could become an option. Analysts believe MLB will fight the bankruptcy, because the league wants the issue to stay within baseball. Additionally, the MLB constitution gives commissioner Bud Selig the power to takeover a team in bankruptcy.

McCourt has been a controversial owner since he acquired the team in 2004. McCourt purchased the Dodgers for $430 million in a highly leveraged transaction. Selig hired Tom Schieffer to monitor the Dodgers in April, because he was worried about the financial situation. The bankruptcy filing has been an embarrassment for the team.

Source:

Associated Press, Los Angeles Dodgers File For Bankruptcy, https://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/los-angeles-dodgers-file-for-bankruptcy-frank-mccourt-blames-bud-selig-decision-062711 (accessed June 27, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Increasing Student Loan Debt May Burden Future Generations

Student loan debt is causing financial problems for many young Americans. The amount of student loan debt in the United States is over $900 billion. Student loan debt will continue to be a problem for graduates, because many states are reducing financial support for students and schools are increasing tuition. Borrowers cannot default on student loan debt when filing for bankruptcy.The student loan problem may affect future generations as well. Many borrowers are taking 20 or 30 years to repay their debt. Graduates in debt are not likely to save for retirement or donate to their colleges. Additionally, students could still being paying off their student loan debt when their children are attending college.

Experts do not recommend borrowing more than $25,000 for college, which represents the cap on loans from the federal government. Loans from the government generally have better terms than private loans. Experts also suggest that students should not borrow more than they expect to earn as a starting salary when they graduate.

Source:

Theo Keith, David Earl & Blake Hanson, Student Loan Crisis Threatens Financial Futures, https://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43584744/ns/business-personal_finance/ (accessed July 5, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Emergency Homeowners Loan Program Offers Aid To Those Struggling With Mortgage

The federal government is attempting to help turn around the struggling housing market and reduce the number of home foreclosures. The Emergency Homeowners Loan Program will help homeowners who are behind on their mortgage and struggling to make payments. Loans of up to $50,000 will be available to the unemployed. Additionally, the loans do not require repayment if certain conditions are met.

The purpose of this loan program is to provide assistance to people who will only need it short-term. The loans offered will last up to two years, borrowers will not be charged interest, and funds will go to the mortgage lender to cover monthly payments and late fees. The loans will be forgiven at a rate of 20% per year. Therefore, a homeowner who stays in their home for five years and stays current with their mortgage will not have to repay the loan. To qualify for the program, borrowers must be in danger of foreclosure and have experienced a loss of income. The program will cost $1 billion.

Critics of the program say that homeowners will be at risk for incurring additional debt. If borrowers do not stay current with their mortgage or sell the home before the loan is completely forgiven, they will be responsible for the loan. However, supporters of the program do not think the program will help enough people. Approximately 4 to 4.5 million homeowners are in foreclosure or at least 90 days behind on their payments. The Emergency Homeowners Loan Program will only provide assistance to about 30,000 people.

Source:

Annamaria Andriotis, More Money for Struggling Homeowners,

https://www.smartmoney.com/spend/real-estate/more-money-for-struggling-homeowners-1309312646029/ (accessed June 29, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Consumer Bankruptcies Down in First Half of 2011

The number of Americans who filed for bankruptcy in January through June of this year decreased from the same period in 2010. According to data from the National Bankruptcy Research Center, 709,303 consumer bankruptcies have been filed in 2011. During the first six months of 2010, 770,117 consumer bankruptcies were filed. The 2011 numbers represent an 8% decrease from the number of filings in the first half of 2010.

Bankruptcy filings in June 2011 decreased 5% from the number of filings in June 2010.  However, the bankruptcy filings in June represent a 4% increase from May filings. The director of the American Bankruptcy Institute has said that the recent decrease in bankruptcy filings indicates that consumers are attempting to lower their debt.

In Minnesota, 10,376 consumer bankruptcies were filed in the first six months of 2011. This represents a 10% decrease from the 11,532 filings in the first half of 2010. June bankruptcy filings in Minnesota were down from May filings, and also down from the number of filings in June 2010 and June 2009.

 

Source:

Kara McGuire, Bankruptcies Decline in 2011,

https://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/blogs/125007464.html (accessed July 5, 2011).

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →


Beware of credit repair scams.

Beware of credit repair scams.

There are many credit repair companies that are essentially scams. They take your money and they do not improve your credit or they only temporarily improve it. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) offers this advice for avoiding credit repair scams:

  • Do not work with a company that wants you to pay for credit repair services before they have provided services
  • Don’t work with a company that won’t tell you your legal rights or explain what you can do on your own
  • Don’t work with any credit repair company that tells you not to contact a credit reporting company directly
  • Avoid a company that suggests disputing all of the information on your credit report, whether or not it is accurate
  • You cannot legally create a new “credit identity”; if you follow illegal advice and commit fraud, you may be charged with a crime

 

Written by Hoglund Law

The attorneys of Hoglund law are licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio. Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC is based in Roseville, Minnesota. In addition to handling cases involving bankruptcy & social security, Hoglund, Chwialkowski & Mrozik, PLLC handles faulty drugs and toxic exposure.

View all author posts →